BMJ  2006;332 (25 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7543.0-d

Cost effectiveness studies show publication bias

Most published cost effectiveness analyses report favourable cost effectiveness ratios below the thresholds set for good value. Bell and colleagues (p 699) carried out a systematic review of 494 studies measuring health effects in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and found that two thirds of published cost effectiveness ratios were below the threshold of $50 000/QALY and only 21% were above $100 000/QALY. Published cost effectiveness analyses are of limited use in identifying health interventions that do not meet popular standards of "cost effectiveness," say the authors.


Figure 1
 Credit: PHOTOS.COM

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review
Chaim M Bell, David R Urbach, Joel G Ray, Ahmed Bayoumi, Allison B Rosen, Dan Greenberg, and Peter J Neumann
BMJ 2006 332: 699-703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ