Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;332:237 (28 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7535.237-a
EditorThe impact of screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) on the rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is topical.1 The introduction of routine cytological screening has reduced the incidence of cervical cancer.
Despite obvious similarities, anal cancer has not been given the same level of attention. There are no guidelines regarding screening. The incidence of anal cancer has increased by almost 40% in women.2 A 26% genotypic concordance exists among concurrent HPV infections of the cervical and anal canals, indicating a common source of infection, such as vaginal and anal intercourse with the same infected partner(s).3 Women with cervical infection have three times the risk of anal infection, and up to 13% will be infected at both sites.3 In the anus, however, non-oncogenic strains predominate. This may explain the lower prevalence of anal compared with cervical cancers.
This, however, does not detract from the fact that young healthy women, infected with HPV 16 and 18, with a regular consumption of alcohol, a history of chlamydial infection, early age of sexual intercourse, and several lifetime sexual partners are at risk of cervical infection.3
These may be the risk factors that point to anal cancer. HIV infection and immunosuppression further increase this risk.2 It may be prudent to use these in establishing guidelines for anal cancer screening, particularly with the growing indication that the two entities may share a common aetiology.
Awori J Hayanga, general surgery resident
University of Michigan Health Systems jhayanga{at}med.umich.edu