References
- Birck R, Krzossovk S, Markowetz F, Schulle P, van der Woude FJ, Braun
C. Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathy: meta-analysis.
Lancet 2003;362:598-603.
- Isenbarger DW, Kent SM, O’Malley PG. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical
trials on the usefulness of acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathy.
Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1454-8.
- Alonso A, Lau J, Jaber BL, Weintraub A, Sarnak MJ. Prevention of radiocontrast
nephropathy with N-acetylcysteine in patients with chronic kidney disease:
a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis
2004;43:1-9.
- Kshirsagar AV, Poole C, Mottl A, Shoham D, Franceschini N, Tudor G,
et al. N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of radiocontrast induced nephropathy:
a meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials. J Am Soc Nephrol
2004;15:761-9.
- Pannu N, Manns B, Lee H, Tonelli M. Systematic review of the impact
of N-acetylcysteine on contrast nephropathy. Kidney Int 2004:65:1366-74.
- Guru V, Fremes SE. The role of N-acetylcysteine in preventing radiographic
contrast-induced nephropathy. Clin Nephrol 2004;62:77-83.
- Bagshaw SM, Ghali WA. Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast-induced
nephropathy after intravascular angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Med 2004;2:38.
- Misra D, Leibowittz K, Gowda RM, Shapiro M, Khan IA. Role of N-acetylcysteine
in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiovascular procedures:
a meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol 2004;27:607-10.
- Nallamothu BK, Shojania KG, Saint S, Hofer TP, Humes HD, Moscucci M,
et al. Is acetylcysteine effective in preventing contrast-related nephropathy?
A meta-analysis. Am J Med 2004;117:938-47.
- Duong MH, MacKenzie TA, Malenka DJ. N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly
reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:471-9.
This Article
Services
Citing Articles
What's new
Latest blogs
Find BMJ on:
Services
Tools
Resources
Rapid responses for this article
There are no rapid responses for this article.
Print issues