BMJ  2005;331 (17 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7530.0-b

GPs with special interests are good but costly

General practitioners with a special interest in dermatology provide a more accessible service than hospital outpatient clinics, while achieving similar clinical outcomes—and are preferred by patients. Salisbury and colleagues (p 1441) randomised nearly 800 patients who were referred to a hospital dermatology clinic with non-urgent conditions to being seen by a general practitioner with a special interest in dermatology or usual hospital outpatient care. In an economic evaluation, Coast and colleagues (p 1444) found that GPs with a special interest were as good as or better than hospital care, but also more costly.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Evaluation of a general practitioner with special interest service for dermatology: randomised controlled trial

Chris Salisbury, Alison Noble, Sue Horrocks, Zoe Crosby, Viv Harrison, Joanna Coast, David de Berker, and Tim Peters
BMJ 2005 331: 1441-1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care

Joanna Coast, Sian Noble, Alison Noble, Sue Horrocks, Oya Asim, Tim J Peters, and Chris Salisbury
BMJ 2005 331: 1444-1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Time to Think: DO we need GPs or dermatologists?

Ramakant Sharma
bmj.com, 20 Dec 2005 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>