BMJ  2005;331:1269 (26 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1269-b

Letter

Classification of stillbirth

Classification is not explanation

EDITOR—Gardosi et al report that under the ReCoDe classification "only 15.2% of stillbirths remained unexplained."1 But if the most common "condition" was fetal growth restriction, and 43% fell into this category, then at least 58% are still unexplained under this system. To classify something falls well short of explaining its cause.

There are many different known causes for fetal growth restriction and doubtless many unknown or at least unidentifiable ones. Some of these may not even contribute to a risk of stillbirth when present. The goal should be a clear understanding of the underlying cause of every stillbirth. The fetal postmortem examination, despite its lack of effect on classification in this study, remains a vital part of this effort and has repeatedly been shown to have an important impact on counselling to parents about the risks of recurrence.

Edwin P Kirk

Department of Medical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
e.kirk{at}unsw.edu.au

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, Francis A, Tonks A. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005;331: 1113-7. (12 November.)[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study
Jason Gardosi, Sue M Kady, Pat McGeown, Andre Francis, and Ann Tonks
BMJ 2005 331: 1113-1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ