Letters
CAM before the storm: authors' reply
BMJ 2005; 331 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1205 (Published 17 November 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1205
- Trevor D Thompson, clinical lecturer (trevor.thompson@bristol.ac.uk),
- Gene Feder, professor of primary care research and development
- Academic Department of Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL
- Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 4AT
EDITOR—Predictably, our editorial on the integration of complementary therapies (CAM) into the NHS failed to satisfy the enthusiasts or sceptics.1
We do not think that the debate about appropriate evaluative methodologies has been resolved. For example, the distinction between contextual and specific effects is problematic, …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.