BMJ  2005;331:714 (1 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7519.714-a

News

US teenager's parents sue school over depression screening test

New York

The parents of an Indiana teenager have filed a suit in a federal court in the state's Northern District, charging that school officials violated their privacy rights and parental rights by subjecting their daughter to a mental health screening examination without their permission.

The suit is seen as significant because President Bush has promoted a controversial plan to encourage widespread mental health screening for people "of all ages" in the United States ( BMJ 2004;328; 1458[Free Full Text]).

The screening programme at the centre of the legal suit, TeenScreen, was endorsed as a "model" programme by President Bush's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health.

The complaint, filed on 19 September, charges that in December 2004 Chelsea Rhoades, then a 15 year old student at Penn High School, Mishawaka, was told after she took the TeenScreen examination that she had obsessive compulsive disorder and social anxiety disorder.

Chelsea has spoken out against the screening and, with her parents, alleges in the complaint that "a majority" of the students "subjected to TeenScreen" with her were also told they had "some mental or psychological disorder."

The Rhoades family charges that TeenScreen test results "are highly subjective" and that "there is a lack of evidence that the screening actually results in a decreased risk of suicide attempts."

The programme is currently in use at 424 sites in 43 states, the press release says. The money was made available under the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Act, which President Bush signed into law in October 2004 to promote programmes to prevent suicide in young people.

Columbia University's TeenScreen, which urges "universal" voluntary screening for all teenagers, has come under fire for offering free cinema passes and other inducements to teenagers in the hope of encouraging them to return parental consent forms ( BMJ 2005; 331: 592 (17 Sep)[Free Full Text]).

The programme has also been criticised by the Rutherford Institute, a non-profit civil liberties organisation, for using "passive consent," in which only parents who do not want to have their children screened have to sign a form and send it in to the school. If the school does not receive a form, it is assumed that the parents do not object.

Laurie Flynn, national programme director of TeenScreen, said that only 15% to 20% of schools use passive screening and that the choice to require the active consent of parents was left up to local schools. "We name active consent a preferred best practice, we train applicants to use it, and we offer templates to assist them in doing so. [But] in some school districts passive consent is the norm for all student health activities," she said.

---

Longer versions of these articles are on bmj.com

President Bush's plan, Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America, is at www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/FullReport.htm

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Shearer, M C, Bermingham, S L (2008). The ethics of paediatric anti-depressant use: erring on the side of caution. J. Med. Ethics 34: 710-714 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Getting it straight

James C. Coyne
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2005 [Full text]

Re: Getting it straight

Annabel Ferriman
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2005 [Full text]

TeenScreen as Junk Science

Steven M. Ferry
bmj.com, 12 Oct 2005 [Full text]

The Real Story on TeenScreen

Doyle Mills
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

TeenScreen Response

Cynthia Pinsonnault
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Teen Screen

Sharon A Hillestad
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Too Gentle on Teen Screen

Maurice D. Blehert
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Pro's and Con's

Don Calley
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

The robbing of Self Determination of our youth

Hanan Islam
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Teen Screen Horror

Dharma Rahkonen
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Clarification about the Columbia TeenScreen Program

Laurie Flynn
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Teen Screening; Look Don't Listen: Indiana Parent's Sue

Christina Kinne
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Thank God

Arthur S Prelle
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Re: Clarification about the Columbia TeenScreen Program

Jeanne Lenzer
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Mental Health Screening Ridiculous

Gwenda L Eliason
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Human Rights abuse

John F Prior
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Record numbers

Joan McClusky
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Editorial note

Sharon Davies
bmj.com, 5 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Seperate the issues

Stewart E Cambridge
bmj.com, 7 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Re: Mental Health Screening Ridiculous

Alex Anderson
bmj.com, 7 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Biological or psychological

E.Roberta Norris
bmj.com, 7 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Why I Love My ADD

Steven Plog
bmj.com, 9 Oct 2005 [Full text]

FYI - some data to consider

DeQuincy Lezine
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Mental Health should receive General Health Approach

Laura Medow, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Oct 2005 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>