Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331 (24 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7518.0-d
A cluster of articles presents various opinions about assisted dying, which will be debated next month in the House of Lords. Branthwaite (p 681) argues that people who want assisted suicide should have the same rights as patients who can end their lives by refusing life sustaining treatment. George and colleagues (p 684) say that legalised euthanasia would leave vulnerable groups open to therapeutic killing without consent. Sommerville (p 686) says that the BMA has adopted a neutral policy to allow parliament to decide. Tännsjö (p 689) presents three moral outlooks and concludes that permitting euthanasia in limited circumstances seems the most beneficial approach. And a Dutch group reflects on a deade of monitoring euthanasia in the Netherlands (p 691).
|
|
Credit: IVAN SANFORD/PHOTOTAKE/ANP
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses