BMJ  2005;331:611-612 (17 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.38575.664549.F7 (published 19 August 2005)

Paper

Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey

¹ MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, ² WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Görresstr 15, D-53113 Bonn, Germany

Introduction

Obesity levels are high and increasing worldwide. Being overweight is linked with increased death rates and contributes to a wide range of conditions, including ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, certain cancers, and diseases of the gall bladder.¹ The principal cause of obesity is an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure. And there is growing recognition that, independently of individual characteristics, place of residence may be associated with health outcomes, including body size² and health related behaviours, such as level of physical exercise.³

Few studies have explored which features of the local neighbourhood might be related to these outcomes or behaviours, although perceived attractiveness has been found to be related to levels of physical activity.⁴ Levels of incivilities, such as litter and graffiti, are associated with poorer health outcomes such as general wellbeing but not, to our knowledge, with levels of physical activity. Few studies use objectively measured indicators of the residential environment or similar research instruments across different settings. Based on our previous work, we hypothesised that areas which are pleasant with lots of greenery and few incivilities might encourage people to take exercise and thereby influence levels of obesity.

Participants, methods, and results

To tackle this hypothesis systematically, we drew upon data collected in the LARES study (Large Analysis and Review of European Housing and Health Status), which was done in 2002-3 in eight European countries, varying in their wealth, culture, and history.⁵ This survey includes data on adults (n = 6919) in Angers (France), Bonn (Germany), Bratislava (Slovakia), Budapest (Hungary), Ferreira do Alentejo (Portugal), Forlì (Italy), Geneva (Switzerland), and Vilnius (Lithuania). The same survey methods and training of the surveyors were applied in all cities. A strength of the study is that it is not generally subject to same source bias—that is, it does not rely solely on self assessed perceptions of both health and environment. Housing and health questionnaires captured self reported data on the health of occupants (including self assessed height and weight, which we then used to calculate body mass index, and level of physical activity) and the dwelling and surrounding environment via face to face interview. Trained surveyors used an inspection sheet to assess the immediate residential environment, including the amount of graffiti, litter, and dog mess, as well as the level of vegetation and greenery visible on the dwelling and streets immediately surrounding it. We recoded physical activity into two levels (never/seldom and often) and incivilities and greenery into five levels—low to high. The analysis controlled for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and city of residence, and excluded respondents who reported having a physical handicap or constraint. Dietary intake was not measured in this survey.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Effect of litter, and greenery on likelihood of being overweight/obese or being frequently physically active

 

For respondents whose residential environment contains high levels of greenery, the likelihood of being more physically active is more than three times as high, and the likelihood of being overweight and obese is about 40% less (table). Conversely, for respondents whose residential environment contained high levels of incivilities, the likelihood of being more physically active is about 50% less, and the likelihood of being overweight or obese is about 50% higher.

Comment

In this study of a range of European cities, we find that objectively assessed features of the residential environment are associated with the likelihood of being physically active and not being overweight or obese. Our analysis is limited because it is cross sectional and may be subject to differences in interpretation and reporting between countries—for example, in the reporting of height and weight. In efforts to promote physical activity and reduce weight, however, attention should be paid to environmental facilitators and barriers as well as individual factors.

What is known on this topic Area of residence is increasingly recognised as being associated with levels of obesity and physical activity What this study adds Higher levels of greenery and lower levels of graffiti and litter in residential environments are associated with being physically active and not being overweight or obese; efforts to promote activity and reduce weight should take into account environmental facilitators and barriers

---

This article was posted on bmj.com on 19 August 2005: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38575.664549.F7

We thank Matthias Braubach, Nathalie Röbbel, and members of the WHO Large Analysis and Review of European Housing and Health Status study team for the survey data and Alastair Leyland and Geoff Der for statistical advice.

Contributors: All authors contributed to the design and writing up of the study. AE did the analysis and is guarantor.

Funding: No additional funding.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: Not needed.

References

1. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley E, Field A, Colditz G, Dietz W. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 1999;282: 1523-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Ellaway A, Anderson A, Macintyre S. Does area of residence affect body size and shape? Int J Obes 1997;21: 304-8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Sundquist J, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28: 841-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med 2001;33: 434-40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. Bonnefoy XR, Braubach M, Moissonnier B, Monolbaev K, Röbbel N. Housing and health in Europe: preliminary results of a pan-European study. Am J Public Health 2003;93: 1559-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

(Accepted 5 July 2005)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Social deprivation and prognostic benefits of cardiac surgery: observational study of 44 902 patients from five hospitals over 10 years

D Pagano, N Freemantle, B Bridgewater, N Howell, D Ray, M Jackson, B M Fabri, J Au, D Keenan, B Kirkup, B E Keogh on behalf of the Quality and Outcomes Research Unit (QuORU) UHB Birmingham and the North West Quality Improvement Programme in Cardiac Interventions (UKNWQIP)
BMJ 2009 338: b902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Do graffiti make you fatter?
BMJ 2005 331: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Pagano, D, Freemantle, N, Bridgewater, B, Howell, N, Ray, D, Jackson, M, Fabri, B M, Au, J, Keenan, D, Kirkup, B, Keogh, B E, on behalf of the Quality and Outcomes Research Uni, (2009). Social deprivation and prognostic benefits of cardiac surgery: observational study of 44 902 patients from five hospitals over 10 years. BMJ 338: b902-b902 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Franzini, L., Elliott, M. N., Cuccaro, P., Schuster, M., Gilliland, M. J., Grunbaum, J. A., Franklin, F., Tortolero, S. R. (2009). Influences of Physical and Social Neighborhood Environments on Children's Physical Activity and Obesity. Am. J. Public Health 99: 271-278 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mujahid, M. S., Roux, A. V. D., Shen, M., Gowda, D., Sanchez, B., Shea, S., Jacobs, D. R. Jr., Jackson, S. A. (2008). Relation between Neighborhood Environments and Obesity in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 167: 1349-1357 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ming Wen, , Browning, C. R., Cagney, K. A. (2007). Neighbourhood Deprivation, Social Capital and Regular Exercise during Adulthood: A Multilevel Study in Chicago. Urban Stud 44: 2651-2671 [Abstract]  
• Dawson, J., Hillsdon, M., Boller, I., Foster, C. (2007). Perceived barriers to walking in the neighbourhood environment and change in physical activity levels over 12 months. Br. J. Sports. Med. 41: 562-568 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Papas, M. A., Alberg, A. J., Ewing, R., Helzlsouer, K. J., Gary, T. L., Klassen, A. C. (2007). The Built Environment and Obesity. Epidemiol Rev 0: mxm009v1- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pearce, J., Witten, K., Hiscock, R., Blakely, T. (2007). Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources?. Int J Epidemiol 36: 348-355 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wells, N. M., Ashdown, S. P., Davies, E. H. S., Cowett, F. D., Yang, Y. (2007). Environment, Design, and Obesity: Opportunities for Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research. Environment and Behavior 39: 6-33 [Abstract]  
• Manca, M (2006). Physical activity exercise and cardiovascular health.. Br. J. Sports. Med. 40: 820-820 [Full text]  
• Shenassa, E. D., Liebhaber, A., Ezeamama, A. (2006). Perceived Safety of Area of Residence and Exercise: A Pan-European Study. Am J Epidemiol 163: 1012-1017 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more >>