BMJ  2005;331:235 (23 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7510.235

Letter

Health care based on priorities is lost in decentralisation

EDITOR—Decentralisation of the health system was applied in all transition countries in the 1990s.1-3 In most countries it was encouraged by the necessity to reform the inherited model of health organisation and to achieve the final goal—an efficient and fair health system. Croatia has special experience in decentralisation, primarily because of its geographical, political, and administrative circumstances but also because of its decentralised health system during the socialist regime in the 1980s.

Firstly, Croatia is a country with extreme differences between its regions. The income per head in the richest region is 10 times that in the poorest region.

Secondly, decentralisation reforms were not based on analyses of the problems and assessment of resources but on maintaining the framework within which they were implemented. Such implementation of the changes resulted in a complete change of the essence of the local health system, whereas the given framework imposed limitations on the development and changes, instead of fostering them.

Thirdly, decentralisation was implemented without having organised a local network of professionals that would work on the local level and would be able to manage local health needs.

Decentralisation is always a challenge in any health system and is mostly looked at as a series of political and organisational measures. Unfortunately, the expectation that decentralisation will ensure successful professional activities is often overlooked in the analyses. Furthermore, the measures and the purpose of decentralisation are often not recognised as important elements of political culture. The primary purpose of decentralisation—health care based on the real priorities and resources—therefore remains marginal.

Aleksandar Dzakula, research fellow

Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, Rockefellerova 4, Zagreb, Croatia adzakula{at}snz.hr


Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. McKee M, Fister K. Post-communist transition and health in Europe. BMJ 2004;329: 1355-6.[Free Full Text]
  2. Fuenzalida-Puelma HL. Health care reform in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Budapest: OSI (Local Government and Public Services Reform Initiative), 2002: 81-8.
  3. Horvath MT, ed. Decentralization: experiments and reforms. Budapest: OSI (Local Government and Public Services Reform Initiative), 2000: 15-8.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Post-communist transition and health in Europe
Martin McKee and Kristina Fister
BMJ 2004 329: 1355-1356. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Health care, decentralization and priorites: different experience in different countries
Ivan Kociæ
bmj.com, 27 Jul 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ