Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:1364-1365 (11 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.38415.633762.F7 (published 13 April 2005)
Eila S Sailas, medical doctor1, Benjamin Feodoroff, bachelor of medicine1, Matti Virkkunen, professor3, Kristian Wahlbeck, professor2
1 STAKES, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, PO Box 220, 00531 Helsinki, Finland, 2 Vaasa Central Hospital, Psychiatric Unit, 65130 Vaasa, Finland, 3 Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 320, 00029 HUCH, Finland
Correspondence to: E S Sailas eila.sailas{at}stakes.fi
The earlier cohort from 1984-5 comprised 656 prisoners (719, with 63 (8.8%) missing identification numbers), and the later cohort included 370 prisoners (377, with 7 (1.9%) missing identification numbers). This temporal decrease shows the effect of the policy to reduce the number of young prisoners. The cohorts did not differ in terms of sex (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.19); in the earlier cohort there were 18 (0.03%) women, in the later 5 (0.01%).
The number of inmates with at least one hospital treatment for any mental disorder increased significantly (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.3, age adjusted) over time compared with the general population, in which we detected no increase in hospitalisations for mental disorders (1.0, 0.7 to 1.4; table). The increase in treatment for psychosis was significant between the two cohorts (2.7, 1.4 to 5.1, age adjusted) and it was significant for substance dependence (3.0, 2.0 to 4.6, age adjusted). In the control groups the changes in prevalence of these disorders were not significant (1.6, 0.7 to 3.5 and 0.9, 0.3 to 3.0).
|
|
The absolute number of prisoners who had had inpatient treatment for psychosis or substance dependence increased from the earlier to the later cohort. The odds of being hospitalised for schizophrenia in the earlier prisoner group were fourfold greater (3.9, 1.6 to 9.4) than in the control group but were eightfold greater (8.0, 2.7 to 23.5) in the later cohort.
Our findings reflect the failure of healthcare systems and emphasise the necessity for early screening of mental disorders in delinquents.
This article was posted on bmj.com on 13 April 2005: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38415.633762.F7
Contributors: ESS conceived the study. ESS and BF collected the data. ESS, BF, and KW analysed the data and drafted the paper. KW supervised and coordinated the research. MV discussed the data and supervised the research. ESS is guarantor.
Funding: Supported by a grant from Finska Läkaresällskapet and done as a part of the Merttu-project of the Finnish Academy of Finland (Grant 105218).
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Criminal Sanctions Agency, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, and the department of psychiatry, Helsinki University Central Hospital.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses