BMJ  2005;330 (28 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7502.0-a

... and intensive rehabilitation is cheaper

Surgical stabilisation of the spine for treating chronic low back pain is not cost effective when compared with an intensive rehabilitation programme from the perspective of health providers and patients. In a cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial, Rivero-Arias and colleagues (p 1239) found that the estimated mean total cost per patient was £7830 in the surgery group and £4526 in the rehabilitation group, with the mean quality adjustment life years 1.004 and 0.936 respectively. The authors warn, however, that surgery could become cost effective if, for example, the proportion of rehabilitation patients who subsequently have surgery continues to increase.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial
Oliver Rivero-Arias, Helen Campbell, Alastair Gray, Jeremy Fairbank, Helen Frost, James Wilson-MacDonald for the Spine Stabilisation Trial Group
BMJ 2005 330: 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ