Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330 (7 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7499.0-b
Although underwater birth promotes natural labour and is a safe and effective form of pain management, it also poses potential risks for the baby. On page 1071, Kassim and colleagues present a case report of a full term infant weighing 3150 g born underwater from a 34 year old, healthy primigravida who had had an uneventful pregnancy. Shortly after birth the baby was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with neonatal respiratory stress. The authors believe that the problem was aspiration of the birthing pool water.
|
|
Credit: MOOSE AZIM/MOTHER & BABY PICTURE LIBRARY
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+