BMJ  2005;330:938-939 (23 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38376.505382.AE (published 4 February 2005)

Paper

Trends in number of hysterectomies performed in England for menorrhagia: examination of health episode statistics, 1989 to 2002-3

Peter C Reid, consultant gynaecologist1, Faizah Mukri, senior house officer1

1 Directorate of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Luton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Trust, Luton LU4 0DZ

Correspondence to: P C Reid Peter.Reid{at}ldh-tr.anglox.nhs.uk

Introduction

Twenty years ago 60% of patients with menorrhagia who were referred to a gynaecologist had a hysterectomy as treatment.1 Endometrial ablation was first described in the United Kingdom in 1989 and is a viable surgical alternative to hysterectomy.2 The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena, Schering Health) is highly effective in reducing menstrual bleeding and has been shown to reduce the numbers of patients proceeding to hysterectomy.3 It would be expected therefore that the numbers of hysterectomies would be falling. Nearly half of women referred to secondary care with menorrhagia, however, express a preference for hysterectomy,4 and it should be recognised that hysterectomy remains an excellent treatment for menstrual problems and brings high levels of patient satisfaction. We aimed to observe trends in the number of hysterectomies performed for menorrhagia in England.

Methods and results

 Introduction
 Methods and results
 Comment
 References
We examined NHS hospital episode statistics compiled from data submitted by over 300 NHS trusts in England for the years 1989-90 to 2002-3. The figures for 2001-2 and 2002-3 have not been adjusted to account for shortfalls in the number of records submitted.

No single international classification of diseases (ICD) code exists for menorrhagia, so data included several codes, from both the ninth and tenth revisions (ICD-9: 626.2, 626.8, and 627.0; and ICD-10: N92.0, N92.1, N92.4, N92.5, and N92.6). Operation codes for hysterectomy are Q07, Q08. We used the codes Q17 and Q16 combined with Y114 (microwave endometrial ablation) and Y118 (thermal balloon ablation) to determine the number of endometrial ablations. We analysed data for patients aged 20 to 60 years.

From 1989-90 to 1994-5 an average of 23 056 hysterectomies a year were performed for menorrhagia in the NHS in England. Since 1995-6 there has been a sustained and substantial fall in this number (figure). In 2002-3, 8332 hysterectomies and 4921 endometrial ablations were performed, representing a reduction of 64% in the number of hysterectomies and a reduction of 43% (13 253 v 23 284) in the total number of operations for menorrhagia compared with 1989-90.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Number of hysterectomies for menorrhagia from 1989-90 to 2002-3 in NHS trusts in England

 

Comment

The number of hysterectomies for menorrhagia in England has fallen substantially to just over one third (36%) of the number of a decade ago. The fall in hysterectomies is not due to endometrial ablation alone as nearly 10 000 fewer operations are being performed a year.

Active education of good management of menorrhagia and promotion of effective medical management in primary care halves the number of referrals to secondary care but doubles the risk of surgery of those referred,5 suggesting a neutral effect on hysterectomy. The fall cannot be attributed to more operations being performed in the private sector as hysterectomy numbers are falling similarly in that sector (David Horwell, personal communication).


What is already known on this topic

Hysterectomy is a common and effective management for heavy periods

New technologies, including endometrial ablation and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, have the potential to reduce the number of hysterectomies

What this study adds

The number of hysterectomies performed for heavy periods is only a third that of a decade ago


Although not licensed for treating menorrhagia until January 2001, Mirena has been used as a contraceptive method since May 1995, which coincides with the start of the fall in hysterectomies. The hypothesis is that Mirena is already in widespread use and having a considerable impact on the number of hysterectomies being performed. The epidemiology of Mirena for the management of menorrhagia in primary care remains to be elucidated and should be answered by the ECLIPSE study (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number 86566246 (www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn)). Care should be taken with this interpretation as the use of Mirena for the management of menorrhagia is a relatively new development, and as over half of patients who have a Mirena inserted in randomised studies go on to have a hysterectomy4 we may yet see an increase in surgery over the next three or four years.

Being aware of this very substantial fall in hysterectomies is important and may be helpful in counselling patients before referral. The data also suggest that hysterectomy is no longer the usual management for menorrhagia in secondary care and have great implications for the future surgical training of gynaecologists.


This article was posted on bmj.com on 4 February 2005: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38376.505382.AE

Contributors: PCR had the original idea for the study, analysed the data, wrote the paper, and is the guarantor. FM helped with the design and data acquisition.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: PCR has been the recipient of grants from the NHS for research into endometrial ablation and Schering Finland for research into the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena).

Ethical approval: None required.

References

  1. Coulter A, Bradlow J, Agass M, Martin-Bates C, Tulloch A. Outcomes of referrals to gynaecology outpatient clinics for menstrual problems: an audit of general practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98: 789-96.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Aberdeen Endometrial Ablation Trials Group. A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: outcome at four years. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106: 360-6.[Medline]
  3. Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P, Aalto A-M, Grenman S, Kivelä A, et al. Clinical outcomes and costs with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia. Randomised trial 5-year follow-up. JAMA 2004;291: 1456-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kennedy ADM, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, Dwyer N, Rees M, Horsley S, et al. A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia. Health Technology Assessment 2003;7(8): 1-45.
  5. Fender GRK, Prentice A, Nixon RM, Gorst T, Duffy SW, Day NE, et al. Management of menorrhagia: an audit of practices in the Anglia menorrhagia education study. BMJ 2001;322: 523-4.[Free Full Text]
(Accepted 11 January 2005)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Hysterectomy for benign conditions
Leroy C Edozien
BMJ 2005 330: 1457-1458. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Management of menorrhagia: an audit of practices in the Anglia menorrhagia education study
Guy R K Fender, Andrew Prentice, Richard M Nixon, Tess Gorst, Stephen W Duffy, Nicholas E Day, and Stephen K Smith
BMJ 2001 322: 523-524. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Brummer, T. H.I., Jalkanen, J., Fraser, J., Heikkinen, A.-M., Kauko, M., Makinen, J., Puistola, U., Sjoberg, J., Tomas, E., Harkki, P. (2009). FINHYST 2006--national prospective 1-year survey of 5 279 hysterectomies. Hum Reprod 24: 2515-2522 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rae, M., Mohamad, A., Price, D., Hadoke, P. W. F., Walker, B. R., Mason, J. I., Hillier, S. G., Critchley, H. O. D. (2009). Cortisol Inactivation by 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 May Enhance Endometrial Angiogenesis via Reduced Thrombospondin-1 in Heavy Menstruation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94: 1443-1450 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Justin, W., Ibraheim, M., Bagtharia, S., Haloob, R. (2007). Current minimal access techniques in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 9: 223-232 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group, (2007). Endometrial bleeding. Hum Reprod Update 13: 421-431 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Smith, O.P.M., Jabbour, H.N., Critchley, H.O.D. (2007). Cyclooxygenase enzyme expression and E series prostaglandin receptor signalling are enhanced in heavy menstruation. Hum Reprod 22: 1450-1456 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Clarke, A., Chang, Y. M., McPherson, K. (2006). Removing organs "just in case"--is prophylactic removal of the ovaries a good thing?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 186-187 [Full text]  
  • Edozien, L. C (2005). Hysterectomy for benign conditions. BMJ 330: 1457-1458 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Menorrhagia and levonorgestrel IUD dangers
Ellen C G Grant
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2005 [Full text]
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System probably reducing female sterilisations by Half
john s ashcroft
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2005 [Full text]
Failure to document adverse effects
Nora W. Coffey
bmj.com, 23 Apr 2005 [Full text]
An inadvertent downside to a decreasing trend in hysterectomies
Sanjeev Sharma
bmj.com, 25 Apr 2005 [Full text]
A welcome and worldwide trend in hysterectomies
Jai B Sharma, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Apr 2005 [Full text]
Medical gynaecology for menorrhagia
Ellen C G Grant
bmj.com, 26 Apr 2005 [Full text]
Evidencebased medical treatment and endometrial ablative techniques responsible for falling trends in hysterectomies
Monika Malhotra
bmj.com, 28 Apr 2005 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ