Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:857-858 (16 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7496.857
Clear rules about stopping treatment in individual patients are needed
The article by Ballard et al in this issue (p 874) offers an opportunity to discuss the role of drugs in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.1 This investigator driven randomised clinical trial has tested the hypothesis that the atypical neuroleptic quetiapine and the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine would be better than placebo for treating agitation in institutionalised patients in severe stages of Alzheimer's disease. Using measures of agitation (the Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory) and cognition (the severe impairment battery) appropriate for this stage of dementia, the authors showed that agitation improved equally in the three arms of the trial but a measurable decline in cognition occurred in patients taking quetiapine. They conclude that these two drugs seemed of no benefit in patients with dementia and agitation in institutional care, and that quetiapine should not be used as alternative treatment to risperidone or olanzapine in people with dementia.
Showing the benefit of drugs on behaviour has been difficult in nursing home settings. Patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease living in the community who were treated with the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil over 24 weeks have shown an improvement, compared with placebo, in the total score as well as on the apathy, depression, and anxiety items of the neuropsychiatric inventory.2 However, when the same drug and outcome were used, no such benefit occurred for patients at a similar severity of disease living in a nursing home setting.3 Is this difference related to an observer bias, since behavioural problems in dementia are best assessed by interviewing informants who know the patient wellfor example, are family members better than professional caregivers at detecting behavioural changes?4 This is not an issue in Ballard et al's study since all treated patients lived in institutions, and recent data showed good correlation between informant rating and direct observation of behaviours.5
Was it appropriate to target agitation in this study? Clearly yes, since agitation is one of the behaviours most commonly related to severity in dementia of various causes and has a marked impact on caregivers,6 and because uncertainty exists about the best management of agitation, pharmacological or otherwise.7
Does the publication by Ballard et al mean that rivastigmine and quetiapine should be avoided in dementia? Evidence from a recently published randomised controlled trial shows that rivastigmine is useful and well tolerated in dementia associated with Parkinson's disease,8 and in an open label trial quetiapine has been shown to improve psychotic symptoms and cognition in this condition.9 The evidence for efficacy of rivastigmine and other cholinesterase inhibitors in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease is established, even by the current report from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.10 The issue is whether they are worth their costs from society's point of view.
From a clinical perspective, cholinesterase inhibitors are helpful in the management of many of the symptoms associated with dementia for individual patients. The art of treatment is to use the right drug for the right symptoms at the proper stage of disease, starting low and going slow. Perhaps clear stopping rules for drugs used in dementia based on evidence from randomised controlled trials and taking into account individual patients' responses to treatment will resolve the current debate about drugs for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Ballard et al have added useful information to the body of evidence from randomised controlled trials.
Serge Gauthier, professor of psychiatry, neurology and neurosurgery, and medicine
McGill Center for Studies in Aging, 6825 LaSalle Blvd, Verdun (Montréal), Québec, Canada H4H 1R3 (Serge.gauthier{at}mcgill.ca)
Papers p 874
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.