Table 2 Results of sensitivity analyses for deaths attributable to passive smoking


General population

Hospitality employees

Exposed at work

Exposed at home

Assumption 
 applied

20-64 years exposed at home

All workforce exposed at work

≥65 years exposed at home

Fifth of pub, bar, nightclub workers

Fifth of hotel and restaurant workers

All pub, bar, nightclub workers

All hotel and restaurant workers

Lower 95% confidence limit*













Subtotal

1684

204

4357

11

11

18

47

Difference (%){dagger}

–1454 (–44){ddagger}

–3602 (–45)

–32 (–59)§



Upper 95% confidence limit*













Subtotal

3683

1085

11426

33

46

40

102

Difference (%){dagger}

1426 (43){ddagger}

3467 (44)

25 (46)§



Relative risk for stroke equivalent to relative risk for ischaemic heart disease









Subtotal

2532

518

6860

22

26

27

70

Difference (%){dagger}

–293 (–9){ddagger}

–1099 (–14)

–6 (–10)§



Australian prevalence plus smoking regulations as in Republic of Ireland









Subtotal

2211

0

5384

0

0

24

61

Difference (%){dagger}

–1131 (–34){ddagger}

–2575 (–32)

–54 (–100)§



* Taken from Woodward and Laugesen.15

{dagger} Difference relative to equivalent figures in table 2.

{ddagger} For all aged 20-65 years.

§ For workplace exposure in all hospitality employees.

Figures for prevalence from White et al27; all workplaces in the Republic of Ireland are now smoke free.




Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview