BMJ  2005;330:56-57 (8 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7482.56

Editorial

Primary care trusts and primary care research

Research networks and academic departments can help to do much needed research

Primary care is central to the NHS and primary care research provides "the missing link in the development of high quality, evidence based health care for populations."^{1 2} The recent development of primary care trusts, which are responsible for commissioning local health services, has changed the landscape for primary care research in the NHS.³ In addition to their already formidable service duties, primary care trusts also have research responsibilities.⁴ Unfortunately, the competing demands on primary care trusts for establishing research governance and meeting government targets have made primary care research a luxury that few trusts can afford.

Despite the government's documented commitment to primary care trusts and their role in primary care research, scepticism exists about the ability of the trusts to take on this role. In a 2002 House of Lords debate, Baroness Northover questioned the health minister on the responsibilities of primary care trusts, saying, "Many of us have doubts about primary care trusts, both in relation to their lack of preparedness for their responsibilities and their natural primary care orientation... there can be no certainty that primary care trusts will commission in a way that promotes and safeguards education, training, and research."⁵

A recent joint ministerial review responded to these concerns.⁶ The review supported the original assessments, identifying "a lack of understanding in primary care trusts about roles and responsibilities in relation to learning and research across the whole of health, social care, and education."⁶ The review also found that primary care trusts "find it difficult to influence their local research strategy as the bulk of NHS research funding is allocated, without reference to them, to secondary care organisations."⁶

Similarly, the financial support for primary care research is also a cause for concern. The 2002-3 allocation for primary care research was only a small proportion of the £540m NHS budget.⁷ In addition, the recent annual research and development report from the NHS ranked the primary care focus of current NHS research programmes poorly, with about one quarter ranking weak.⁸

The key to supporting primary care research lies in successful partnerships between primary care trusts and the academic sector. Because many primary care trusts do not currently have expertise in research, primary care research networks and academic departments ought to be natural partners for primary care trusts. The development of sites for the national network for the management and governance of primary care trust research offers a location for the coexistence of management, capacity building, and partnership.

Since the 1980s primary care research networks, which are multidisciplinary networks of general practices active in research, have formed an important part of the backbone of primary care research.⁹ Primary care research networks are unique in that they also offer a wealth of experience in research capacity building in community settings, which is precisely the need faced by primary care trusts.¹⁰

Many academic departments of primary care are keen to build partnerships with primary care trusts.¹¹ Such linkages would help universities build research capacity and enable primary care trusts to meet their education and research objectives. However, some medical schools fear that small scale, local health services research will not be highly rated in the impending research assessment exercise that will take place in 2007 and thus may be dissuaded from working with primary care trusts.

Many opportunities exist for primary care research and primary care trusts to have a central role in improving the quality of primary care in the NHS.¹² The new general practice contract has provisions that offer further opportunities for primary care trust leadership and collaboration in research and service development. Specifically, the new framework for the measurement of quality of care, requires substantial input and participation by primary care trusts. They will be responsible for developing data systems to track and monitor performance of general practitioners and ensure that the quality framework functions.

Over the next few years, the National Programme for Information Technology will also be rolled out, leading to the eventual creation of integrated health records across primary and secondary care. The existence of these data, alongside data from the new general practitioner contract, creates major opportunities for primary care research.

An essential prerequisite to taking advantage of these opportunities is clear guidance on national and local research and development priorities for primary care. This in turn needs to be combined with adequate levels of funding, both centrally from the Department of Health and locally from primary care trusts. Evidence suggests that this is happening, for example, through the requirement that the new clinical research networks have strong input from primary care. However, if this does not occur, primary care research may decline further, leading to major long term adverse consequences for the NHS and healthcare systems overseas that rely on the NHS to provide evidence to support their own reforms.

Public Health Policy Unit, School of Public Policy, University College London, London WC1H 9QU (fchen{at}u.washington.edu)

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London W6 8RP

---

Competing interests: None declared.

References

1. van Weel C, Rosser W. Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med 2004;2 (suppl): s5-s16.
2. Mant D. R&D in primary care: national working group report. Leeds: NHS Executive, 1997.
3. Department of Health. Shifting the balance of power. London: DoH, 2002.
4. Department of Health. Research governance framework for health and social care. London: DoH, 2001.
5. National Health Service Reform and Health Care Professions Bill. London: Hansard, 2002.
6. Department of Health, Department for Education and Skills, National Assembly for Wales. Joint ministerial review of the role of primary care trusts in relation to learning and research in the new National Health Service. London: DoH, 2004.
7. McNally N, Kerrison S, Pollock AM. Reforming clinical research and development in England. BMJ 2003;327: 550-3.[Free Full Text]
8. Department of Health. Summary report: National Health Service R&D annual reporting 2002/03. London: DoH, 2003.
9. Thomas P, Griffiths F, Kai J, O'Dwyer A. Networks for research in primary health care. BMJ 2001;322: 588-90.[Free Full Text]
10. Carter YH, Shaw S, Sibbald B. Primary care research networks: an evolving model meriting national evaluation. Br J Gen Pract 2000: 859-60.
11. Dowrick C, ed. Heads of departments of general practice and primary care in the medical schools of the United Kingdom. New century, new challenges. Oxon: Society of Academic Primary Care, 2002.
12. Mant D, Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Knotterus A, Wallace P, van Weel C. The state of primary care research. Lancet 2004;364: 1004-6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary care research networks may herald new collaborations

Roger Jones, Adrian Eddleston, and Gill Rowlands
BMJ 2005 330: 733. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Thomas, P., Graffy, J., Wallace, P., Kirby, M. (2006). How Primary Care Networks Can Help Integrate Academic and Service Initiatives in Primary Care. Ann Fam Med 4: 235-239 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Shaw, S., Boynton, P. M, Greenhalgh, T. (2005). Research governance: where did it come from, what does it mean?. JRSM 98: 496-502 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jones, R., Eddleston, A., Rowlands, G. (2005). Primary care research networks may herald new collaborations. BMJ 330: 733-733 [Full text]  
• McClarey, M., Smith, S., Moreno-Casbas, T., Jones-Mallada, C., Condell, S. L., Poortvliet, P., Fyffe, T. (2005). Letters to the Editor. Journal of Research in Nursing 10: 121-124  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Public Health Observatories have a key role to promote primary care research

John R Wilkinson
bmj.com, 8 Jan 2005 [Full text]

Overcoming one of the barriers between Primary Care and Research

Mary T McClarey, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]

Another reason to rethink research governance requirements?

Ike Anya
bmj.com, 11 Jan 2005 [Full text]

Supporting Research in Primary Care

Roger H Jones, et al.
bmj.com, 14 Jan 2005 [Full text]

Their needs be public involvement in decisions

susanne mccabe
bmj.com, 29 Jan 2005 [Full text]

RDSU and the weakest link

Michael Gordon
bmj.com, 29 Jan 2005 [Full text]

Primary care research – all is not lost!

Susan A Nancarrow, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Feb 2005 [Full text]

Primary Care Networks and PCTs must learn to live and work together in the muddy ground of local research health services research

Richard Byng
bmj.com, 5 Feb 2005 [Full text]

The authors respond

Frederick M Chen, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Mar 2005 [Full text]