Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;330:4-5 (1 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7481.4
Includes diagnosis, specific treatments, and appropriate communication
In all parts of our healthcare system we meet patients presenting with physical symptoms that lack an obvious organic basis. The terms used to describe such symptomsmedically unexplained symptoms or functional somatic symptomsare purely descriptive and do not imply psychogenesis. Other names such as somatisation and somatoform disorder are also being used but imply different definitions.1-3 Patients with medically unexplained symptoms do not fit into the existing framework of a biomedical model that tends to focus on the exclusion of physical disease. However, the exclusion of relevant physical disease may not in itself cure the patient. He or she may still feel ill and seek medical care. Medically unexplained symptoms therefore represent a clinical problem that must be taken seriously.1-4 General practice has a key role in the management of this clinical problem as at least 20-30% of primary care patients have medically unexplained symptoms. Current evidence indicates that medical care of medically unexplained symptoms should include improvements in three interrelated elementsdiagnosis, specific treatment strategies, and communication.
The concept of medically unexplained symptoms comprises a spectrum of disorders ranging from mild transitory illness to chronic disorders with severe disability. Many of the affected patients do not receive a correct diagnosis and undergo numerous fruitless investigations and attempts at treatment. The narrow focus on the somatic aspects of a complex problem may reinforce their concerns about having a physical disease, make them less satisfied with the healthcare system, contribute to the development of chronic disablement, and cause healthcare costs to become excessive.1 3-5 At the same time doctors become frustrated when dealing with medically unexplained symptoms.6
Doctors must have theoretical knowledge about medically unexplained symptoms to be able to diagnose and manage patients presenting with such symptoms appropriately. Diagnosis is not merely the exclusion of serious physical diseases but also the simultaneous consideration of medically unexplained symptoms and classic psychiatric disorders. Such assessment and proper management require good theoretical understanding of the problem, but currently the theoretical and practical training in medically unexplained symptoms is insufficient in most university curriculums and postgraduate training programmes for general practitioners.7
Substantial evidence shows that medically unexplained symptoms can be treated effectively by specialists using, for example, cognitive behaviour therapy.8 However, such specialist treatment is seldom available and even at best would be an option for only a minority of the patients encountered in general practice. We also need programmes targeting the management of medically unexplained symptoms in the primary care setting. A systematic review of specific somatisation treatments in general practice described 10 randomised trials conducted until 2000, but most of the treatments reviewed required the participation of specially trained therapists.9 In 1989 Goldberg and Gask introduced the reattribution model, which can be applied by general practitioners after brief training and takes a cognitive oriented approach to the treatment of medically unexplained symptoms. Essential elements in the model are: to make the patient feel understood, then to broaden the agenda, and finally to negotiate a new understanding of the symptoms including psychosocial factors. The reattribution model has been tested in before and after studies and in a single randomised controlled trial showing positive effects on general practitioners' interviewing skills, healthcare costs, and patients' health.9 10
In 2000 Fink et al modified the model to the extended reattribution and management model in order to include a broader spectrum of disorders.4 A randomised controlled trial of this model has shown an appreciable effect on general practitioners' attitude and awareness of medically unexplained symptoms, and results at the level of the patients are under way.3 Further improvement of specific treatment strategies should focus on refinement of the programmes developed and on their implementation on a broader scale in vocational training and continuing medical education.
Recent qualitative research into aspects of the communication between doctors and patients has shown that doctors' usual ways of communicating with patients who have medically unexplained symptoms may need essential adjustment. Patients seem to be prepared for simultaneous biological and psychosocial approaches to evaluation of symptoms.11 The methods currently used by general practitioners to reassure patients that their symptoms are part of normality are insufficient.12 If reassurance does not address the patients' specific concerns it may exacerbate their presentation of somatic symptoms and increase the likelihood of somatic management outcomes.12 These findings are in line with previous observations that doctors' explanations are often at odds with the patients' own thinking and result in conflict, a feeling of rejection, and undermined confidence.5
The qualitative studies point out the importance of an improved dialogue between doctor and patient that generates "tangible, exculpating, and involving explanations" grounded in patients' concerns.5 12 Such communication issues have been integrated into the specific management models of reattribution. Improved and evidence based communication strategies are essential in any comprehensive management strategy.5 11 12 However, they cannot stand alone but must be incorporated in the specific treatment programmes.
In conclusion, we should offer the same professional management and quality of care to the many patients with medically unexplained symptoms as we offer to patients with explicable symptoms. Today this is not the case, and we need to bring existing evidence into medical education and to renew our management of patients with medically unexplained symptoms in general practice. In this process we must also be ready to adjust paradigms about good communication based on new evidence. This process should be driven by comprehensive research into patients with medically unexplained symptoms and by health services research exploring the best possible implementation of appropriate management strategies.
Marianne Rosendal, senior researcher
Research Unit for General Practice, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark (m.rosendal{at}dadlnet.dk)
Frede Olesen, professor
Research Unit for General Practice, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Per Fink, senior lecturer
Research Unit for Functional Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
Read all Rapid Responses