Posted as supplied by author.
w1 Eddy D. Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 1990;263:2493-505.
w2 Djulbegovic B, Morris L, Lyman GH. Evidentiary challenges to evidence-based medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2000;6:1-11.
w3 Kassirer JP. Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. A cause of excessive testing. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1489-91.
w4 Chalmers I. Why comparisons must address genuine
uncertainties:
www.jameslindlibrary.org/essays/comparisons/genuine_uncertainties.html
(accessed
w5 Djulbegovic B. Principles of research synthesis. In: Perry M, ed. ASCO educational session, 39 annual meeting. Washington, DC: ASCO, 2003:737-750.
w6 Chalmers I, Sackett D, Silagy C. The Cochrane Collaboration.
In: Maynard A, Chalmers I, eds. Non-random reflections on health services
research.
w7 Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624-32.
w8 Partridge N, Scadding J. The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials. Lancet 2004;364:1923-4.
What's new
Student BMJ poll
Resources
Tools
Online poll
Services
Rapid responses for this article
There are no rapid responses for this article.Most read last week
Print issues
Student BMJ
Intimate examinations
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.
