BMJ  2004;329:1386-1389 (11 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1386

Clinical review

Recent developments in non-invasive cardiology

¹ Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP

Introduction

Tremendous advances have been made in non-invasive cardiology, such as improved visualisation of the anatomy and function of the heart and better physiological markers of cardiac function and heart disease. These advances provide better diagnostic information and guide therapy and risk stratification. All the techniques give information over and above that derived from the clinical history and examination, but should be interpreted in the context of the clinical background. In this review, we discuss important developments in non-invasive cardiology, focusing on areas that have recently come into clinical use.

Sources and selection criteria

We searched PubMed for recent trials and systematic reviews on non-invasive cardiac imaging published between 2000 and July 2004. We also consulted recent international guidelines to develop an overview of the evidence base in non-invasive cardiology.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging has improved the detection of heart disease. Accurate diagnosis provides the basis of treatment options and of monitoring response to treatment. It also gives important prognostic information that can be difficult to glean from the history and examination alone. Conventional procedures such as echocardiography often produce suboptimal images due to poor echo windows with limited spatial resolution. In particular, the apex of the left ventricle is difficult to visualise, resulting in missed diagnoses such as apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.¹ X ray angiography is invasive and associated with morbidity and mortality as well as exposure to ionising radiation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance yields high resolution, high contrast images by mapping the radio signals absorbed and emitted by hydrogen nuclei in a powerful magnetic field. No x rays are involved. The contrast agent gadolinium is sometimes used to increase the signal. Gadolinium is safe, even in patients with severe renal failure. Scans can be oriented in any plane of the body and are not limited by acoustic windows. Because of its three dimensional nature, magnetic resonance imaging has become the ideal method for measuring ventricular mass and volume.² Some patients are not suitable for the procedure, such as those with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators. Scanning should also be avoided in patients with metallic fragments near a vital structure, such as the retina, or with brain aneurysm clips. Patients with claustrophobia may be difficult to scan, although small doses of benzodiazepine can help. Pregnant women can be scanned, although preferably not in the first trimester.

Recent advances Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is the newest technique for non-invasive cardiology It assesses cardiac function, mass, and volume and can detect myocardial infarction and fibrosis Computed tomography is used to quantify coronary calcium, high scores being related to increased risk, but its use remains controversial Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy single photon emission computed tomography is cost effective in investigating patients with suspected coronary disease Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is now a valuable technique for guiding practice in hypertension The level of B natriuretic peptide increases with ventricular dysfunction, thus providing prognostic information

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging has a rapidly increasing role in cardiology (box 1) and is routinely used to assess anatomy, cardiovascular function, and blood flow. It is also valuable in angiography, where it has supplanted invasive techniques other than for assessing the coronary circulation.

Infarction and viability
Gadolinium accumulates in myocardial scar and fibrotic tissue and provides high resolution images, something that has never before been possible in vivo. Myocardial infarction can be detected with exquisite sensitivity, which has the potential to improve the management of chest pain syndromes (fig 1) and to predict functional improvement after revascularisation.³ Emerging practical applications include adjudication when other techniques give equivocal results (for example, borderline abnormal results on electrocardiography, minor motion wall abnormalities on echocardiography), and the assessment of myocardial viability.^{4 5} These findings correlate well with positron emission tomography⁶ but without the drawbacks of poorer spatial resolution, cost, and radiation. Such studies should be considered when there is uncertainty about previous infarction or about the benefits of revascularisation.

Fig 1 Gadolinium enhanced images of patient with lateral wall myocardial infarction. Four chamber view of heart (A), with bright signal in lateral wall of left ventricle (LV). Signal results from gadolinium late enhancement as result of accumulation of contrast agent in scar tissue. (B) Corresponding short axis cut through left ventricle

 

Coronary angiography
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary disease and characterisation of atheroma is still under investigation, but shows promise. Around 72% of patients have been accurately diagnosed as having any coronary artery disease and 87% as having left main vessel or three vessel disease.⁷ Uniquely, cardiovascular magnetic resonance can be used to examine the composition and size of carotid and coronary plaques and has the potential to identify plaques vulnerable to rupture.⁸ Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is now used to identify the course of anomalous coronary arteries, which are associated with sudden death, and for this application the technique is regarded as the ideal.⁹ It is not recommended for routine detection of coronary artery disease as its spatial resolution is inferior to that of coronary angiography.

Myocardial perfusion imaging
Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is being developed. This involves fast imaging of the myocardium during the passage of a bolus of gadolinium. The procedure takes less than 20 minutes, involves no ionising radiation, and has much higher resolution than conventional techniques such as scintigraphy single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography. In a study of patients with angina but with normal coronary arteries (syndrome X), subendocardial perfusion gave abnormal results with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging but not with scintigraphy single photon emission.¹⁰ Perfusion imaging may lead to better diagnosis and treatment of patients with normal coronary angiograms (10-20% of coronary angiograms). Early work on perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in coronary disease seems promising.¹¹

Box 1: Current clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging General—measurement of cardiac volume and function; if echocardiography is unsatisfactory Great vessels—accurate sizing; detection of dissection, coarctation, stenosis; anomalous vessels Congenital heart disease—check for concordance of atrioventricular or ventriculoarterial connections; check for great vessels connections; assessment of conduits; assessment of complex anatomy Ischaemic heart disease—detection of regional wall motion abnormalities or infarction; assessment of viability Cardiomyopathy—identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; detection of fibrosis or scarring; risk stratification; quantification of iron overload in thalassemia Left ventricular mass—accurate assessment in hypertension; assessment of response to therapy Valvular disease—quantification of regurgitation Pericardium—assessment of thickening Cardiac masses—characterisation of tissue; assessment of extent of tumour

X ray computed tomography in ischaemic heart disease

Computed tomography is another area being assessed for non-invasive assessment of the coronary circulation. It is highly sensitive to calcium, a marker of atherosclerosis.¹² Computed tomography generates an index of coronary calcification—the total coronary artery calcium score. This index is being used for the early detection of asymptomatic coronary atherosclerosis and, more recently, for risk stratification in established coronary disease. Computed tomography may also be used for coronary angiography. The results are similar to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, but clinical application remains to be defined.

Arterial calcification is an integral part of atherosclerosis, and the extent of calcium is related to the burden of atheroma (fig 2). The higher the calcium score the more likely is coronary stenosis, although the sites of the greatest calcium deposits are not usually the site of stenosis. Coronary calcium therefore cannot be used to locate stenosis when planning revascularisation. The number of vulnerable plaques, however, rises with increasing atheroma burden, and therefore the calcium score may be expected to predict cardiac events. A key limitation is that a lack of calcium does not exclude the presence of active atherosclerosis in an artery, as shown in hearts during autopsy when "soft" vulnerable plaques and severe coronary artery stenosis may be present even in the absence of calcium.¹³ Studies have shown an increased rate of cardiac events in asymptomatic patients with a high calcium score (> 400; scores of 100-400 represent intermediate risk and those of 0-100 a low risk).¹⁴This area remains controversial.¹⁵ Current guidelines recommend more work in this area and suggest that computed tomography is not yet suitable for widespread population screening.¹⁶ Computed tomography is being used in some screening programmes to reassure patients with low coronary calcium scores. The cost effectiveness of this approach is being evaluated. In patients with high scores, aggressive modification of risk factors and further investigations such as myocardial perfusion scintigraphy single photon emission computed tomography are appropriate.

Fig 2 Computed tomography image of left and right coronary artery coming off aortic root

 

Box 2: Key ongoing clinical trials UK natriuretic peptide study—pragmatic multicentre study of the diagnostic value of measuring plasma B type natriuretic peptide in patients with suspected heart failure in primary care Multiethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA)—National Institutes of Health led 10 year multicentre study to evaluate electron beam computed tomography and other imaging techniques for the prediction of coronary heart disease risk in healthy people Risk factors, evaluation of coronary calcium and lifestyle (RECALL) study—population based, prospective cohort study of the relative risk associated with the extent of coronary atherosclerosis measured by EBCT-derived calcium scores for myocardial infarction and cardiac death in 5 years in 4200 unselected people Beyond endorsed lipid lowering with EBCT scanning (BELLES)—study of the effect of 12 months' treatment with lipid lowering drugs on total coronary calcium score

Nuclear cardiology

A difficult challenge in clinical practice is evaluating the differential importance of coronary lesions in patients with multivessel disease. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the current standard for assessing the haemodynamic effects of coronary stenoses. It relies on the difference in distribution of a radioactive tracer, such as thallium, at rest and after stress. In patients with myocardial ischaemia, uptake of tracer is reduced after stress and improves at rest. Single photon emission computed tomography is more specific and sensitive in the diagnosis of ischaemia than is exercise electrocardiography, and the extent and severity of the abnormality is strongly predictive of future cardiac events. This information can be used to direct revascularisation strategies such as angioplasty or bypass surgery. Single photon emission computed tomography is also useful in the non-invasive evaluation of patients, particularly women, with equivocal or suboptimal exercise test results.

Major advances have been recently implemented with single photon emission computed tomography. Firstly, image gating has allowed the simultaneous assessment of perfusion and wall motion by linking cardiac motion to each point in the cardiac cycle on the electrocardiogram. This improves specificity in areas affected by attenuation artefacts, while providing information on ventricular volumes and function.¹⁷ Secondly, cost effectiveness is now established, and strategies that include the technique early in the work-up of patients with suspected coronary disease have been shown to be beneficial in terms of clinical outcome and cost.¹⁸ Thirdly, recent work has established the technique's benefit in avoiding unnecessary admissions to hospital in patients with acute coronary syndromes,¹⁹ and the acceptance that normal or near normal perfusion results usually obviate the need for invasive coronary angiography because of low hard annual event rates of < 1% (fig 3). In contrast, patients with abnormal scans have a 12-fold greater annual event rate (7.4%).²⁰

Fig 3 Nuclear perfusion scan showing noticeably impaired perfusion in all territories except for basal septum. Results also offer quantitative analysis of left ventricular volume and estimation of ejection fraction

 

B natriuretic peptide in heart failure

Diagnosis in patients with suspected heart failure can be difficult, particularly when echo access is limited. Follow up of patients to determine therapeutic response is also problematic. B natriuretic peptide is a neurohormone secreted primarily by myocytes in response to volume expansion and pressure overload, and it plays a key part in circulatory homeostasis.²¹ The plasma level of B natriuretic peptide is high (> 100 pg/ml) in patients with ventricular dysfunction,²² and this enables the differentiation between pulmonary and cardiac causes of dyspnoea.²³ B natriuretic peptide is also a powerful marker of the severity heart failure and its prognosis (see fig C on bmj).²⁴ It has been used to monitor the efficacy of heart failure therapy²⁵ and to predict the success of blocker treatment.²⁶ Simple assays are now available, at low cost. Work is underway to determine the value of B natriuretic peptide for heart failure in primary care and for emergency diagnosis.^{27 28}. Recently published work has also demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of B natriuretic peptide screening in asymptomatic men over the age of 60.²⁹

Additional educational resources Review papers Chronic heart failure: national guidelines for diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care. Developed by the National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions at the Royal College of Physicians. 2003 www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/CHF/heartfailure.pdf Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A. Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42: 1867-78[Abstract/Free Full Text] Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31: 261-91[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] Websites Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (www.scmr.org)—background information for the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging American Society for Echocardiography (asecho.org)—excellent website offering information on echocardiography to both healthcare professionals and the public American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (www.asnc.org)—comprehensive and well designed website with links to further educational resources in the specialty of nuclear cardiology Information for patients British Heart Foundation (www.bhf.org.uk)—website designed for the public as well as for cardiologists interested in cardiovascular research Cardiomyopathy Association (www.cardiomyopathy.org)—support group for patients with cardiomyopathy American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org)—website providing a plethora of resources on common cardiac conditions and on managing risks associated with cardiac disease

---

Additional figures and advances in echocardiography, cardiomyopathy, and non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring are on bmj.com

Contributors: All authors were involved in the research required to produce the manuscript as well as in the preparation of the manuscript. DJP will act as guarantor.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: Not required.

References

1. Moon JC, Fisher NG, McKenna WJ, Pennell DJ. Detection of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with non-diagnostic echocardiography. Heart 2004;90: 645-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, Lahiri A, Coats AJ, Cleland JG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J 2000;21: 1387-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Beek AM, Kühl HP, Bondarenko O, Twisk JW, Hofman MB, van Dockum WG, et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42: 895-901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343: 1445-53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima JA. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;106: 1083-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, Momose M, Sammer A, Haas F, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105: 162-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Flamm SD, Plein S, Nagel E, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001;345: 1863-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, Echelard D, Ortiz G, Ellington E, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation 2002;105; 181-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Taylor AM, Thorne SA, Rubens MB, Jhooti P, Keegan J, Gatehouse PD, et al. Coronary artery imaging in grown-up congenital heart disease: complementary role of MR and x-ray coronary angiography. Circulation 2000;101: 1670-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Grothues F, Firmin DN, Collins P, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome-X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 1948-53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnackenburg B, Wegscheider K, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108(4): 432-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Rich S, McLaughlin VV. Detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease: the emerging role of electron beam computed tomography. Prev Med 2002;34: 1-10.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995;92: 2157-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, He ZX, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, et al. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 2000;101: 850-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM, Shavelle RM, Tang W, Ginzton LE, et al. Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near term future coronary events in high risk adults. Circulation 1999;99: 2633-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hachamovitch R, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000;102: 126-40.[Free Full Text]
17. Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, Beller GA, Benjamin C, Gagnon A. Comparison between the end-diastolic images and the summed images of gated 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT perfusion study in detection of coronary artery disease in women. J Nucl Cardiol 1999;6: 169-76.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
18. Underwood SR, Godman B, Salyani S, Ogle JR, Ell PJ. Economics of myocardial perfusion imaging in Europe—the EMPIRE study. Eur Heart J 1999;20: 157-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42(7): 1318-33.[Free Full Text]
20. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE, Hachamovitch R, Germano G, Lewin HC, Bateman TM, et al. Evidence-based risk assessment in noninvasive imaging. J Nucl Med 2001;42: 1424-36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Maisel A. B type natriuretic peptide levels: diagnostic and prognostic in congestive heart failure. Circulation 2002;105: 2328.[Free Full Text]
22. Krishnaswamy P, Lubien E, Clopton P, Koon J, Kazanegra R, Wanner E, et al. Utility of B-natriuretic peptide levels in identifying patients with left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction. Am J Med 2001;111: 274-9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
23. Chen HH, Burnett JC. Natriuretic peptides in the pathophysiology of congestive heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep 2000;2: 198-205.[Medline]
24. Harrison A, Morrison LK, Krishnaswamy P. B-type natriuretic peptide predicts future cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39: 131-8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
25. Troughton RW, Frampton CM, Yandle TG, Espiner EA, Nicholls MG, Richards AM. Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminoterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) concentrations. Lancet 2000;355: 1126-30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
26. Richards AM, Doughty R, Nicholls MG, MacMahon S, Sharpe N, Murphy J, et al. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and adrenomedullin: prognostic utility and prediction of benefit from carvedilol in chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Australia-New Zealand Heart Failure Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37: 1781-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;347: 161-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hobbs FDR, Davis RC, Roalfe AK, Davies MK, Kenkre JE. Reliability of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide assay in diagnosis of heart failure: cohort study in representative and high risk community populations. BMJ 2002;324: 1498-500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Heidenreich PA, Gubens MA, Fonarow GC, Konstam MA, Stevenson LW, Shekelle PG. Cost-effectiveness of screening with B-type natriuretic peptide to identify patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43: 1019-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

(Accepted 15 October 2004)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Recent advances in non-invasive cardiology: Article does not mention echocardiography

John Chambers, Kevin Fox, and Alan Fraser
BMJ 2005 330: 731. [Extract] [Full Text]

Recent advances in non-invasive cardiology: Coronary angiography using computed tomography has been underplayed

G Morgan-Hughes, C A Roobottom, N Manghat, and A J Marshall
BMJ 2005 330: 731-732. [Extract] [Full Text]

Non-invasive cardiology excels
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Chambers, J., Fox, K., Fraser, A. (2005). Recent advances in non-invasive cardiology: Article does not mention echocardiography. BMJ 330: 731-731 [Full text]  
• Morgan-Hughes, G, Roobottom, C A, Manghat, N, Marshall, A J (2005). Recent advances in non-invasive cardiology: Coronary angiography using computed tomography has been underplayed. BMJ 330: 731-732 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Recent developments in non-invasive cardiology: Surely CT coronary angiography has been underplayed

Gareth J Morgan-Hughes, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Dec 2004 [Full text]

Recent developments in non-invasive assessment of mitral regurgitation

Faisal F. Syed, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Dec 2004 [Full text]

Recent Advances in Echocardiography are important and clinically relevant

Abdullah A Mohammed
bmj.com, 18 Dec 2004 [Full text]

Non-invasive cardiology

John Chambers, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Dec 2004 [Full text]

Recent developments in non-invasive cardiology

DENIS PELLERIN, et al.
bmj.com, 21 Jan 2005 [Full text]

MRI Scans for imaging in Cardiology

Mahmood Ahmad, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Jan 2007 [Full text]