BMJ  2004;329:1345 (4 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1345

Letter

Transparency and trust

Figure for ghost written articles was misquoted

EDITOR—Editor's choice in the issue of 23 October on transparency and trust seems to perpetuate a misleading press citation of my testimony to a House of Commons Select Committee last month.1 The original statement, supported by the transcript, was that 50% of the articles dealing with therapeutics were ghost written, not 50% of all articles.2 3

I, like most readers, almost instinctively shrink from a claim that anything like 50% of the articles, even those on therapeutics alone, are ghost written in journals such as the BMJ, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and the Lancet. But equally instinctively, most readers if asked to estimate how many of the key articles on their drugs, and this means articles in major journals, pharmaceutical companies are likely to have had a determining role in writing, would probably come up with figures close to 100%. If the question is in what proportion of articles on therapeutics in major journals do the apparent academics hold the raw data and are able to share that data if needed, the answer in many estimates will not be much greater than 0%.

Abbasi usefully brings out a point made in the select committee's meeting, that the key problem with ghost writing is not the medical writing itself but the issue of transparency. When there is reason to believe that the articles that result from the ghost writing process do not offer a fair representation of the underlying data there is a problem. Otherwise ghost writing poses much less of a problem.

David T Healy, professor of psychiatry

Bangor LL57 2PW Healy-Hergest{at}compuserve.com


Competing interests: DH is a speaker, trialist, or consultant for all major pharmaceutical companies and an expert witness in medicolegal actions involving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

References

  1. Abbasi K. Editor's choice. Transparency and trust. BMJ 2004;329: 0-g. (23 October.)[Free Full Text]
  2. Healy D, Cattell D. The interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics. Br J Psychiatry 2003;182: 22-7.
  3. Elliott C. Pharma goes to the laundry. Hastings Center Report 2004;34(5): 18-23.[ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

DTP immunisation is linked with survival
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Why nakedness is bad
Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Transparency and trust
Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Woolley, K. L., Ely, J. A., Woolley, M. J., Findlay, L., Lynch, F. A., Choi, Y., McDonald, J. M. (2006). Declaration of medical writing assistance in international peer-reviewed publications.. JAMA 296: 932-934 [Full text]  



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview