BMJ  2004;329:1103 (6 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7474.1103-a

Letter

Recent developments in Bell's palsy

Does a more recent single research paper trump a systematic review?

EDITOR—I am a jobbing general practitioner, and the paper by Holland and Weiner on Bell's palsy left me confused.1 To treat somebody is a hard decision—not to treat somebody, even harder.

In 2002 the BMJ published an article about recent advances in neurology that proposed that there might be a case for prednisolone but none so far for antiviral agents.2 This was based on systematic reviews.

This article quotes from just two more recent papers (Axelsson et al and Murakami et al3 4) and says that now the evidence base is clearly in favour of using antivirals. Given that further randomised controlled trials are in the pipeline, the authors' full support of antiviral use is more opinion than evidence, is it not?

Does a single more recent research paper trump a previous systematic review?

I was also concerned by the statement in the blue box at the start of the paper that claimed under recent developments that treatment of partial Bell's palsy is controversial: a few patients don't recover if left untreated. Is it not also true that a few patients don't recover even if treated?

In addition, I thought the article muddled and unhelpful. Should patients be admitted? What do the authors mean by psychological support?

Every year or so when I see a case of Bell's palsy I phone my local teaching hospital and ask the neurology registrar what the latest news is. The only thing I learnt from this article is perhaps I also ought to ask the registrar in ear, nose, and throat medicine too: perhaps we could have a live debate?

James A Cave, general practitioner

Newbury RG20 8UY ectopicmailbox-collector1{at}yahoo.co.uk


Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. Holland NJ, Weiner GM. Recent developments in Bell's palsy. BMJ 2004;329: 553-7. (4 September.)[Free Full Text]
  2. Wiebe S, Nicolle MW. Recent developments in neurology. BMJ 2002;324: 656-60.[Free Full Text]
  3. Axelsson S, Lindberg S, Stjernquist-Desatnik A. Outcome of treatment with valacyclovir and prednisone in patients with Bell's palsy. Ann Oto Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112: 197.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Murakami S, Hato N, Horiuchi J, Honda N, Gyo K, Yanagihara N. Treatment of Ramsay Hunt syndrome with acyclovir-prednisone: significance of early diagnosis and treatment. Ann Neurol 1997;41: 353-7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Recent developments in Bell's palsy
N Julian Holland and Graeme M Weiner
BMJ 2004 329: 553-557. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Recent developments: Recent developments in neurology
Samuel Wiebe and Michael W Nicolle
BMJ 2002 324: 656-660. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Bell's Palsy/ Lower Motor Neurone 7th palsy
Joydip Majumder
bmj.com, 10 Nov 2004 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview