Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:1070 (6 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.38243.672396.55 (published 22 October 2004)
Attila Sipos, honorary senior clinical lecturer in psychiatry1, Finn Rasmussen, senior clinical lecturer and associate professor of epidemiology2, Glynn Harrison, professor of mental health1, Per Tynelius, senior statistician2, Glyn Lewis, professor of psychiatric epidemiology1, David A Leon, professor of epidemiology3, David Gunnell, professor of epidemiology4
1 Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Cotham House, University of Bristol BS6 6JL, 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Norrbacka, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden, 3 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, 4 Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PR
Correspondence to: F Rasmussen finn.rasmussen{at}phs.ki.se
Design A population based cohort study.
Setting Sweden.
Subjects 754 330 people born in Sweden between 1973 and 1980 and still alive and resident in Sweden at age 16 years.
Main outcome measures Hospital admission with schizophrenia or non-schizophrenic, non-affective psychosis.
Results After adjustment for birth related exposures, socioeconomic factors, family history of psychosis, and early parental death the overall hazard ratio for each 10 year increase in paternal age was 1.47 (95% confidence interval 1.23 to 1.76) for schizophrenia and 1.12 (0.98 to 1.29) for non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis. This association between paternal age and schizophrenia was present in those with no family history of the disorder (hazard ratio for each 10 year increase in paternal age 1.60, 1.32 to 1.92), but not in those with a family history (0.91, 0.44 to 1.89) (P = 0.04 for interaction).
Conclusions Advancing paternal age is an important independent risk factor for schizophrenia. The stronger association between paternal age and schizophrenia in people without a family history provides further evidence that accumulation of de novo mutations in paternal sperm contributes to the overall risk of schizophrenia.
One study estimated that about a quarter (26.6%) of cases of schizophrenia could be attributed to paternal age.5 It has been suggested that if this association between paternal age and schizophrenia was due to accumulating de novo mutations, sporadic cases of schizophrenia should show a stronger association with increased paternal age compared with cases in people with a known family history of the disorder.12 However, studies to date have been too small to explore fully interactions with other risk factors or have not fully assessed the range of confounding factors that may contribute to the observed associations.1 3 6
Using a large Swedish record linkage database, we investigated the association between paternal age and schizophrenia in offspring, in particular the extent to which observed associations may be confounded by birth related exposures, socioeconomic factors, family history of psychosis, and early parental death. We also investigated whether any associations differed in relation to family history, sex, birth weight, and Apgar score. We investigated the latter two because they have been identified as possible environmental risk factors,13 14 and it has been hypothesised that in the presence of genetic predisposition, exposure to such factors may lead to the clinical manifestation of schizophrenia.15 16
Our analysis was based on records of people admitted to hospital between 1989-2001 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (international classification of diseases, 10th revision, ICD-10: F20; ninth revision, ICD-9, Swedish version: all 295 except 295F and 295H) or other non-affective psychosis (ICD-10: F21-29; ICD-9 Swedish version: 295F, 295H, 297-8) (see table A on bmj.com).
Overall, 42 316 (5.6%) people were excluded from the main analysis because of missing data for one or more of the variables examined (including 93 with schizophrenia and 130 with non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis) or because they developed schizophrenia (68 cases) or other non-affective psychosis (141 cases) before the age of 16 years. Average paternal age was higher in those excluded because of missing data (31.0 v 29.8 years, P < 0.0001). Our analyses are therefore based on 712 014 subjects from 53 2761 distinct families. Only four of the 639 people with schizophrenia and seven of the 1311 with non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis were siblings.
Variables examined
We coded paternal age as < 21, 21-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, and
50 years. We examined the influence of seven possible confounding factors on the associations with paternal age.
10 953), Kr100 001-200 000, Kr200 001-300 000, > Kr300 000); highest socioeconomic index of either parent (blue collar worker, white collar worker, self employed, and other); and highest educational level of either parent (< 9 years of education, 9-10 years of education, full secondary education, higher education).
Data analysis
All statistical analysis was performed with Stata Release 8.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). We used Cox's proportional hazards models to assess the influence of paternal age on psychosis. People were censored at the time of first admission for schizophrenia, non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis, death, or emigration. We used the cluster option in Stata to adjust standard errors for clustering of cases within families. We controlled all reported hazard ratios for sex, age, and maternal age, unless otherwise specified or stratified by sex. We tested the validity of the proportional hazards assumption graphically and used Wald tests to investigate interaction effects.
Table 1 shows the characteristics of subjects in relation to the age of their father. People with older fathers tended also to have older mothers and mothers who had had more pregnancies. People with older fathers were more likely to lose their parents before they reached the age of 18 years; they were more likely to have a family history of psychosis; and their parents were more likely to come from extreme ends of the distribution of the various measures of socioeconomic position.
|
Table 2 shows the hazard ratios for successive five year paternal age groups. In the basic model, adjusted for sex, age, and maternal age, there is a clear increase in the risk of schizophrenia with increasing paternal age. There is a suggestion that the offspring of younger fathers (< 21 years) are also at somewhat greater risk than those with fathers aged 21-24 years (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 2.43), but there was no evidence of a non-linear association between paternal age and schizophrenia (P = 0.39, quadratic). The strength of the association between paternal age and schizophrenia changed hardly at all when we also controlled for risk factors related to birth, parental death before the subject reached the age of 18 years, and family history of schizophrenia, though there was a modest reduction in models after we controlled for the three socioeconomic variables. The variable mostly responsible for this drop was highest annual parental income.
|
Table 3 shows the results for the same series of models for non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis. Overall, we found a much weaker association. Just as with schizophrenia we found an increased risk in the offspring of younger men (< 21 years) with some evidence for a non-linear association (P = 0.01, quadratic).
|
When we combined cases of narrowly defined schizophrenia and non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis into one category the hazard ratio associated with each 10 year increase in paternal age was 1.31 (1.17 to 1.47) when we controlled for sex, age, and maternal age and 1.23 (1.10 to 1.37) in the fully controlled model.
Maternal age showed a weak association with schizophrenia in the unadjusted model (hazard ratio per 10 year increase in maternal age 1.21, 1.02 to 1.43), but this association disappeared as soon as we controlled for paternal age, sex, and age (0.83, 0.64 to 1.07) (see table B on bmj.com). We found a similar pattern for non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis (crude hazard ratio per 10 year increase in maternal age was 1.10 (0.98 to 1.23) and 0.94 (0.79 to 1.12) when we controlled for sex, age, and paternal age
We calculated that the population attributable fraction of schizophrenia in this sample due to having a father aged > 30 years at birth was 15.5%.
Association with family history, sex, birth weight, Apgar scores, and age of onset
Associations with paternal age differed in those with and without a family history of schizophrenia (P = 0.04 for interaction). The hazard ratio for every 10 years of paternal age was 1.60 (1.32 to 1.92) in those with no family history of schizophrenia and 0.91 (0.44 to 1.89) in those with an affected first degree relative.
We found no strong evidence for any marked difference in the association between paternal age and schizophrenia by sex (P = 0.20, for interaction). Hazard ratios increased by 1.65 (1.32 to 2.06) for men and by 1.40 (1.03 to 1.89) for women for every 10 years of paternal age.
We found no evidence for any marked difference in associations in those with high and low birth weight (P = 0.15 for interaction). The association of paternal age with schizophrenia, however, differed in relation to the subjects' Apgar score at birth (P = 0.02 for interaction). In those with normal Apgar scores (7-10) at one minute hazard ratios increased by 1.60 for every 10 years of paternal age (1.33 to 1.92) but not in those with Apgar scores suggestive of the need for resuscitation (hazard ratios decreased by 0.92, 0.31 to 2.76). Similar but weaker effects (P = 0.16 for interaction) were seen with Apgar scores at five minutes. We found no marked change in the strength of association between paternal age and schizophrenia when we restricted the proportional hazards model to the first or the second half of the follow up period.
Strengths and weaknesses of study
We used routinely recorded data on variables related to birth, parents, and adulthood collected before the onset of disease. Furthermore, as cases were ascertained from a national inpatient register the possibility of selection bias was reduced. The large number of cases gives us statistical power to control for a wide range of important confounding factors and investigate whether the associations differ in relation to family history of psychosis or environmental risk factors.
The main limitation of our analysis is that case ascertainment was based on people admitted to hospital only with diagnoses recorded on an administrative database. Though we will have missed people who were not admitted to hospital, studies in the United Kingdom indicate that in the first three years after presentation over 80% of patients are admitted, even in areas with community oriented services.18 Furthermore, analyses of diagnoses recorded on the Swedish inpatient discharge register indicate that schizophrenia is diagnosed with reasonable accuracy.19-20 Another limitation is that a family history of admission with schizophrenia is only a marker for and not the equivalent of genetic vulnerability.
Comparison of findings with earlier research
In comparing our findings with those of earlier studies1-3
5
6 it is important to bear in mind that we were able to distinguish between narrowly defined schizophrenia (ICD-10 F20) and other non-schizophrenic non-affective psychosis (ICD-10 F21-29). One previous study1 also reported a stronger association with paternal age in relation to narrowly defined schizophrenia.
We found a pattern of association across the categories of paternal age that suggested a J shaped rather than a linear association, in line with the initial unadjusted findings of Byrne et al.2 In our study this pattern remained even after we controlled for possible confounders. Two other studies also investigated the possibility of a stronger association of increased paternal age in people with schizophrenia without a family history as opposed to those with a family history, as this would provide further evidence to support the hypothesis that this association is due to accumulating de novo mutations in the germ cells of older fathers. Malaspina et al showed that paternal age was significantly higher for people with schizophrenia without a family history in a small study that compared 35 familial cases with 68 sporadic cases.12 Zammit et al found no evidence for such effects, but their study lacked statistical power.6
The finding that the association between increased paternal age and schizophrenia was evident only in people with normal Apgar scores was based on a relatively small number of cases in people with low scores (n = 31) and should be viewed as preliminary until replicated in other studies.
Conclusions
Our findings confirm advancing paternal age as a strong independent risk factor for schizophrenia and indicate that 15.5% of cases of schizophrenia in our cohort could be due to the patient having a father who was aged > 30 years at birth. We found a stronger association in subjects without a family history of schizophrenia, providing further evidence to support the theory that accumulating de novo mutations in the germ cells of older fathers might contribute to an increased risk of schizophrenia in their offspring.
|
In England and Wales the average paternal age has increased from 29.2 years in 1980 to 32.1 in 2002.21 Using our data we can estimate the hazard ratio associated with an average increase of paternal age by 2.9 years as 1.12. Assuming a conservative background annual incidence rate for schizophrenia of 10/100 00022 for the whole of the UK population (59.2 million in 2002) and that the observed associations are truly causal, this increase in paternal age since 1980 could have led to an additional 710 cases of schizophrenia in 2002 over and above the 5923 cases due to the background incidence rate.
We thank Christina Dalman, Peter Allebeck, and Susanne Wicks for their helpful comments, Stan Zammit for his help with accessing all the relevant literature, and Geoff Adams for statistical/database support.
Contributors: DG, FR, and GH developed the core idea, and FR, AS, DG, GH, GL, DAL, and PT were involved in the design of the study. DG, FR, GH, GL, and DAL raised the research funds. PT prepared the cohort data and did the database linkages. AS carried out the statistical analysis and literature search and wrote the first draft of the paper. DG, DAL, and GL gave advice on statistical methodology. All authors critically reviewed and contributed to the final draft of the paper. FR and AS are guarantors.
Funding: Stanley Medical Research Institute.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: The ethics committee at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden approved this study.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses