BMJ  2004;329 (6 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7474.0-d

Avoid being misled by claims in robust studies

Although guides on identifying weak studies are widely available, clinicians also need to be able to detect when authors of methodologically strong clinical research reports make misleading claims. Montori and colleagues (p 1093) present six helpful pointers and indicate that several strategies for spotting biased reporting are available. They warn that misleading reporting will always be with us, and clinicians need to stay armed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports
Victor M Montori, Roman Jaeschke, Holger J Schünemann, Mohit Bhandari, Jan L Brozek, P J Devereaux, and Gordon H Guyatt
BMJ 2004 329: 1093-1096. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview