Table 2 Results of a meta-analysis for the five gastroprotective strategies on primary and secondary health outcomes. Values are numbers of events (relative risks, with 95% confidence intervals) unless otherwise indicated




H2 receptor antagonist v placebo

Proton pump inhibitor v placebo

Misoprostol v placebo

COX-2 selectives v non-selectives

COX-2 specifics v non-selectives

Primary outcomes











Total No of trial participants

2621

1358

16 945

28 178

25 564

Serious gastrointestinal complications

1 (0.33, 0.0 to 8.1)

3 (0.46, 0.1 to 2.9)

75 (0.57, 0.4 to 0.9)*

43 (0.61, 0.3 to 1.1)

114 (0.55, 0.4 to 0.8){dagger}

Symptomatic ulcers

1 (1.46, 0.1 to 35.5)

18 (0.09, 0.0 to 0.5){dagger}

54 (0.36, 0.2 to 0.7)*

82 (0.41, 0.3 to 0.7)*

281 (0.49, 0.4 to 0.6)*

Serious cardiovascular or renal events

5 (0.53, 0.1 to 3.5)

3 (0.78, 0.1 to 6.3)

4 (1.78, 0.3 to 12.1)

48 (0.95, 0.6 to 1.7)

241 (1.19, 0.8 to 1.8)

Mortality

1 (3.00, 0.1 to 68.3)

1 (0.17, 0.0 to 4.1)

35 (0.89, 0.5 to 1.7)

19 (0.68, 0.3 to 1.6)

78 (1.02, 0.6 to 1.9)

Health related quality of life

N/A

N/A

N/A

Weighted mean difference –0.10 (–1.0 to 0.8)

N/A

Secondary outcomes











Gastrointestinal symptoms

201 (0.72, 0.6 to 0.9){dagger}

45 (0.43, 0.2 to 0.8)*

1218 (0.97, 0.7 to 1.4)

3894 (0.73, 0.7 to 0.8)*

5184 (0.81, 0.7 to 0.9)*

Endoscopic ulcers

250 (0.55, 0.4 to 0.7)*

281 (0.37, 0.3 to 0.5)*

658 (0.33, 0.3 to 0.4)*

24 (0.41, 0.2 to 1.1)

522 (0.25, 0.2 to 0.3)*

Anaemia

1 (3.00, 0.1 to 73.3)

N/A

1 (2.66, 0.1 to 63.8)

6 (0.30, 0.1 to 1.3)

464 (0.62, 0.5 to 0.7){dagger}

Occult bleeding

N/A

N/A

16 (0.46, 0.2 to 1.3)

17 (0.86, 0.3 to 2.2)

N/A

Total dropouts

362 (0.97, 0.8 to 1.1)

116 (0.98, 0.6 to 1.5)

4772 (1.11, 1.0 to 1.2){ddagger}

4274 (0.93, 0.9 to 1.0)*

9510 (0.82, 0.7 to 0.9){dagger}

Dropouts due to gastrointestinal symptoms

57 (0.71, 0.4 to 1.2)

48 (0.45, 0.3 to 0.8)*

2332 (1.36, 1.3 to 1.5)§

1174 (0.63, 0.6 to 0.7)*

2171 (0.69, 0.6 to 0.8){dagger}

N/A=not available. Significance level 5%. *Significant protective relation, no heterogeneity and significance not lost on sensitivity analysis. {dagger}Significant protective relationship, but significant heterogeneity or significance lost on sensitivity analysis. {ddagger}Significant harmful relationship, but significant heterogeneity or significance lost on sensitivity analysis. §Significant harmful relationship, no heterogeneity and significance not lost on sensitivity analysis




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ