BMJ  2004;329 (23 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7472.0-b

Letters may save time

Not all patients referred to a haematologist need to be seen in clinic; a letter will often do. Tso and colleagues (p 946) analysed general practitioners' satisfaction with a letter containing advice on subsequent management, rather than formal outpatient review, for 121 of 274 patients who had been referred to a haematologist. These patients were not deemed to need further investigations or specialised treatment and had no evidence of a serious illness. Most general practitioners, and 72 patients who were interviewed, found a written response acceptable and helpful and would be satisfied with it in the future.

Credit: DAVID MACK/SPL


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Are written responses to some referrals to a general haematology clinic acceptable?
Allison Tso, Lucy Harris, and Tim Littlewood
BMJ 2004 329: 946-947. [Full Text] [PDF]




Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview