BMJ  2004;329 (9 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7470.0

Ultrasonography is not the only way to diagnose DVT

Patients with abnormal results on d-dimer testing and a low clinical probability of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) do not need ultrasonography to exclude the diagnosis. Reviewing 12 studies including 5431 patients, Fancher and colleagues (p 821) found that normal results from a less sensitive d-dimer test would exclude the likelihood of DVT in 99.5% of patients with a low clinical probability of DVT, and a normal highly sensitive d-dimer test would exclude the diagnosis among all patients at low or moderate risk. These patients would not require additional tests, say the authors.

Credit: JAMES KING-HOLMES/SPL


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review
Tonya L Fancher, Richard H White, and Richard L Kravitz
BMJ 2004 329: 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ