Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:655-658 (18 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7467.655
Jodie McVernon, specialist registrar1, Caroline L Trotter, scientist (epidemiology)2, Mary P E Slack, consultant microbiologist3, Mary E Ramsay, consultant epidemiologist1
1 Immunisation Department, Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ, 2 Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 3 Health Protection Agency Specialist and Reference Microbiology Division, Haemophilus Reference Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
Correspondence to: M Ramsay mary.ramsay{at}hpa.org.uk
Design Prospective, laboratory based surveillance of invasive Hib infections and cross sectional seroprevalence study.
Setting England and Wales.
Participants Cases were confirmed by isolation of H influenzae from a normally sterile site, or from a non-sterile site in cases with a diagnosis of epiglottitis. Excess serum samples collected from English 30-39 year olds as part of a national serosurvey were identified for the years 1990, 1994, 1997, 2000, and 2002.
Main outcome measures The number of invasive Hib infections from 1991 to 2003. Population immunity to H influenzae type b in English adults was also measured.
Results After routine infant immunisation was introduced in October 1992, adult Hib infections decreased initially but then rose from a low in 1998 to reach prevaccine levels in 2003. An associated fall in median Hib antibody concentrations occurred, from 1.29 µg/ml (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.64) in 1991 to 0.70 µg/ml (0.57 to 0.89) in 1994 (P = 0.006), with no significant change observed thereafter.
Conclusions Although immunisation of infants resulted in an initial decline in Hib infections in adults, a resurgence in reported cases occurred in 2002-3. This rise was associated with an increase in cases in children and evidence of reduced immunity in older unimmunised cohorts. Childhood immunisation programmes may have unanticipated effects on the epidemiology of disease in older age groups, and surveillance strategies must be targeted at entire populations.
Since 1998 the number of Hib cases in children has almost doubled each year, most of them in children who have been fully immunised according to the United Kingdom's primary vaccination schedule for infants aged 2, 3, and 4 months.2 Contributing factors include lower than anticipated direct protection from infant vaccination,3 wearing off of the initial impact of the "catch up" campaign,4 and the use of less immunogenic, combination vaccines with an acellular pertussis component during 2000-1.5 With the decrease in Hib transmission attributed to use of the conjugate vaccine in the mid-1990s, cases in unimmunised individuals aged 15 years and older also declined,6 presumably as a result of indirect protection or herd immunity. We describe a reduction of this indirect effect of vaccination, as evidenced by a recent increase in invasive Hib infections in adults to prevaccine levels.
Between 1990 and 1995, five regions representing 35% of the English population (East Anglia, Northern, North West, South West, and Oxford) participated in an enhanced regional survey, involving referral of all strains to the Haemophilus Reference Unit. From late 1995, the reference unit followed up reports to the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre from all English laboratories, or from public health doctors and treating clinicians, to obtain an isolate, where possible. To correct for changes in the proportion of isolates typed over time in the national dataset, we used the following formula:
![]() |
The Health Protection Agency's seroepidemiology unit collects anonymous excess serum from hospital laboratories around the country each year.7 Sera taken from individuals with known immunodeficiency are excluded. We identified some 100 samples taken from 30-39 year old men and women for each of the years 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000, and 2002. None of these adults would have been eligible for routine vaccination with Hib conjugate vaccine. The immunoassay laboratory, Health Protection Agency Porton Down, used a standard HbO-HA ELISA to test the sera for antibodies to the Hib capsular polysaccharide polyribosyl-ribitol-phosphate (PRP).8 Because of the highly skewed distribution of antibody concentrations even after log transformation, we used medians as measures of central tendency for comparison over time. We used the binomial method to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the medians. We used a continuity corrected
2 test in Stata, version 7, to assess the differences in median titres between consecutive time points.
|
The most common clinical presentations of invasive Hib infection in adults were pneumonia (n = 142, 22%), bacteraemia (n = 140, 21%), epiglottitis (n = 106, 16%), and meningitis (n = 44, 7%), together constituting two thirds of all reports. The outcome of Hib disease was known for 76% of adult cases reported between 1991 and 2003; the case fatality rate during each year ranged from 0 to 27% and was 11% in 2003. Information on underlying medical conditions has been collected by the health protection Agency since 1996, and such conditions were reported in 18/90 (20%) of Hib cases in 1996-9 and 45/294 (15%) of cases in 2000-3.
Adult infections due to serotype b fell after the Hib vaccine was introduced in October 1992, reaching a low in 1998 and then rising to 2003 (table 1). This trend also became obvious in cases from the five regions conducting enhanced surveillance throughout the period and in the national dataset after adjusting for untyped isolates by using the method described above (fig 1). The incidence in all adults (15 years and older) decreased significantly between 1994 and 2000, followed by an increase in 2002 and 2003, which accompanied the changes in incidence in childhood (table 2).
|
|
Among adult cases with a known serotype, the age distribution differed between Hib and ncHi infections (fig 2). Whereas ncHi was predominantly a cause of serious infections in elderly people, the distribution in Hib cases was bimodal, peaking at 30 years and 65 years, ages at which household exposure to children is common.9
|
Antibody concentrations to H influenzae type b in 30-39 year old English adults, collected at five time points over the period, showed a trend that was in keeping with the numbers of reports (fig 1). Hib antibody titres fell significantly, from 1.29 µg/ml (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.64) in 1991 to 0.70 µg/ml (0.57 to 0.89) in 1994 (P = 0.006), with a further non-significant decrease to 0.53 µg/ml (0.35 to 0.73) in 1997. A small, non-significant increase to 0.69 µg/ml (0.52 to 0.95) occurred in 2000 (P = 0.197), with another slight rise to 0.77 µg/ml (0.56 to 0.97) in 2002 (P = 0.557).
The data presented here show how difficult it is to ensure consistency of case ascertainment over long periods of time and how important it is to account for this in the analysis. Improved reporting and typing led to an apparent increase in the incidence of invasive ncHi disease,6 11 but more constant numbers in recent years show that ascertainment has been stable since 1995. On the basis of unadjusted data, the number of adult Hib infections in recent years is higher than that observed in 1991. When the enhanced regional surveillance data are used, however, and after adjusting national figures for improved ascertainment, the current incidence in adults is similar to the incidence before the vaccine was introduced.
We took serum used to measure immunity to Hib in the population from a national serosurvey resource that collects residual sera from participating laboratories.7 These specimens are stored anonymously, with limited linked information. Although it is possible that changes in selection of serum may have produced bias in the results obtained, comparison of a similar collection of sera in Australia showed no major discrepancy in antibody titres to common vaccine antigens with that from a random cluster survey.12
In contrast to ncHi infection, adults of the ages most likely to mix with children, both as parents and grandparents, seem to be most liable to Hib infections (fig 2). This observation is not surprising, given the high documented rates of parental carriage in families with a child known to be colonised with H influenzae type b or recovering from invasive Hib disease.13-15 It may therefore be predicted that an increase in paediatric Hib infections might be associated with a corresponding rise in adult cases. Of the 11 countries participating in the European Union Invasive Bacterial Infections Surveillance Network (EU-IBIS), only the Netherlands has noted a similar rise in adult Hib cases, from eight reports in 2001 to 15 in 2002,16 the same number observed before the vaccine was introduced in 1993 (source: National Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Netherlands). This increase accompanies an increase in paediatric reports that has been observed despite a vaccine programme that does not use combination vaccines and where a booster is given in the second year of life.17 Although we believe that transmission is most often from child to parent, the reverse may also occur18 and may have contributed to some of the increase in invasive disease observed in children in recent years.
|
Our data show that the reduction in opportunities for natural boosting of immunity has resulted in a decline in specific Hib antibody titres among adults. Mathematical models of Hib transmission predicted that such a decline may lead to an increase in disease in the older unvaccinated population several years after the vaccine was introduced.19 The clinical presentation of or the case fatality due to Hib disease have not changed, and there is no indication that an increase in the prevalence of underlying conditions that predispose to invasive bacterial infection has contributed to this rise.
The high quality of surveillance in England and Wales allowed early detection of an increase in paediatric Hib cases, resulting in the withdrawal of poorly immunogenic vaccines and implementation of a national immunisation programme for children younger than 4 years.20 We anticipate that this campaign will rapidly induce herd immunity and prevent any further increase in infections in all age groups. Evaluation of the potential need for change to the routine immunisation schedule is ongoing and needs to include assessments of direct and indirect vaccine effects. Our findings may also be relevant to control of meningococcal and pneumococcal disease, where herd immunity effects in older unvaccinated age groups have also been observed after the conjugate vaccine was given to children.21 22 It will be important to monitor whether such levels of indirect vaccine protection are sustained and this work emphasises the importance of maintaining surveillance of these infections across the entire age spectrum in the longer term.
Contributors: JM, MPES, and MER obtained and analysed disease incidence data. CLT obtained and analysed seroepidemiological data. All authors contributed to study design and preparation of the final manuscript. MER is guarantor.
Competing interests: MER and MPES have received research grants from vaccine manufacturers. JM was previously employed in an academic research post that was funded by a vaccine manufacturer. MER, MPES, and JM have all received funds from vaccine manufacturers to attend conferences and meetings.
Funding: The seroepidemiology component of this study was partially funded by the Public Health Laboratory Service Small Scientific Initiatives fund. Surveillance for invasive Hib infections is part of the core work of the Health Protection Agency's Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre and Haemophilus Reference Unit.
Ethical approval: The Health Protection Agency has approval under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act to process confidential information about patients for the purposes of monitoring the efficacy and safety of vaccination programmes.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses