Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:461 (21 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7463.461
EDITORThe figures put forward in Gunnell and Ashby's paper on suicide rates and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants, indicative of a rising prescription rate since the launch of these drugs, may be misleading, in that a rising prescription rate does not mean a rising rate of new users.1 A formal model that translates prescriptions into patients, that we hope to submit for peer review later this year, indicates that the bulk of rising prescription rates stems not from an increasing number of new users but rather from an accumulating number of long term users of SSRIs.
|
|
Credit: BERTRAND DEMEE/PHOTONICA
|
This point is important in that the suicide risk with SSRIs has been linked primarily to the early weeks of treatment. If this is the case, then any increase in suicides from increasing use of SSRIs in Britain will have occurred in the years from 1989 through to 1996, after which our model shows that the number of new patients starting on SSRIs stabilises, and the contribution of SSRIs to national suicide rates should remain at some constant level, provided the effects of withdrawal on inducing suicide are not too great. This latter issue has not been studied in randomised trials, although the relative risk of a suicidal act in the post-treatment phase of the recently posted paroxetine studies in children seems to be of the order of 4.3 times greater on drug than placebo.
Graham Aldred, research associate
North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine, Hergest Unit, Ysbyty Gwynedd, North Wales LL57 2PW
David Healy, director
healy_hergest{at}compuserve.com North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine, Hergest Unit, Ysbyty Gwynedd, North Wales LL57 2PW
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.