Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329 (7 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7461.0-g
Most doctors have at some time borne the broken look of Marlon Brando's Colonel Kurtz in Apocalypse Now, dehumanised by the Vietnam War. For me, "the horror" was over 10 years ago as a preregistration doctor in surgery at St James's Hospital, Leeds, about the time the European Working Time Directive was conceived by people with time to think. I began a weekend shift at 8 am on Saturday morning, an endless ward round of patients I'd never seen before with illnesses I little understood. I finished at 9 pm on Monday after non-stop callsmostly straightforward but many bewilderingly complexa couple of cheese sandwiches, a few cans of soft drinks, and three hours of broken sleep on a two seater sofa.
At some point on Sunday evening my fellow junior doctors and I cracked. Overworked, sleepless in surgery, every incident and comment greeted with unstoppable mirth, professionalism replaced by inane amusement at our predicament. By Monday evening we were catatonic Brandos. Sharing this rite of passage with senior colleagues attracted little sympathy: "In my day we had it much worse; whole weeks on call without a break." "The experience will be good for you." But was the experience any good for patients? Was it really any good for any of the doctors who lived it then and live it now? Too much mistreatment of doctors and patients has been excused by what is deemed good for us.
This week, the working time directive should mean fewer doctors in training work more than 58 hours a week (p 310). Rhona MacDonald describes how organisers of health care have had to innovate by rethinking out of hours cover and switching to competency based training (p 301). New medical schools have opened in England to supply enough doctors to compensate some far off day for this reduction in working hours (p 327). What hope that doctors in training will see real benefit? MacDonald, a passionate Scot, argues that those already exploiteddoctors from poorer countries and non career gradeswill be further exploited for doctors in training to benefit. This well meaning legislationlegislation that doctors know to be inapplicable without major reform of the medical workforce and medical trainingis proving hard to implement, as our European round up shows (p 310).
Richard Smith, another passionate Scotby choice, not by birthleft the BMJ last week (p 309). He devoted 25 years of inexhaustible energy to this publication13 years as one of its greatest editorsone eye on blue skies the other on fine detail, working at full tilt to the end as he promised, in defiance of any working time directive. He leaves behind a young teamplus some wise headsdedicated to building on his considerable achievements. The BMJ will miss his genius and his gusto. But as he once told me: "Nobody is bigger than the BMJ, not even me."
Kamran Abbasi, acting editor
(kabbasi{at}bmj.com)
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses