Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329 (7 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7461.0-e
Hospital at home schemes are safe, effective, and cheaper than inpatient care in hospitals for treating many patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and free up hospital beds. A systematic review by Ram and colleagues (p 315) identified seven randomised controlled trials (with 754 patients) comparing hospital at home schemes with inpatient treatment. Mortality and hospital readmission were similar in the two groups of patients. Two studies that compared costs showed that hospital at home care was substantially cheaper than inpatient care.
|
|
Credit: SCOTT CAMAZINE/SPL
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?