BMJ 2004;328:1415-1416 (12 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.38068.716262.F7 (published 11 May 2004)
Paper
Gastrointestinal bleeding after the introduction of COX 2 inhibitors: ecological study
Muhammad Mamdani, senior scientist1,
David N Juurlink, clinical pharmacologist2,
Alex Kopp, analyst1,
Gary Naglie, Mary Trimmer chair in geriatric medicine research3,
Peter C Austin, scientist1,
Andreas Laupacis, chief executive officer1
1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Avenue G106, Toronto, ON, Canada M4N 3M5,
2 Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5,
3 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 550 University Avenue, Room 1008, Toronto, M5G 2A2
Correspondence to: M Mamdani muhammad.mamdani{at}ices.on.ca
Introduction
Recent evidence suggests a lower risk of upper gastrointestinal
haemorrhage for selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX 2) inhibitors
compared with non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) at the patient level,
1-3 although COX 2 inhibitors
are likely not devoid of gastrointestinal toxicity. At the population
level, however, the widespread proliferation of COX 2 inhibitors
might lead to an increase in the overall numbers of people exposed
to anti-inflammatory drugs with uncertain implications on rates
of population-wide gastrointestinal events. We did an ecological
study to examine temporal changes in the use of NSAIDs and upper
gastrointestinal haemorrhage hospitalisation rates among a population
of older individuals after the introduction of COX 2 inhibitors.
Participants, methods, and results
We did a population based cross sectional time series analysis
using administrative healthcare databases covering more than
1.3 million residents of Ontario, Canada, aged at least 66 years.
4 This population has universal access to hospital care, doctors'
services, and prescription drugs on a formulary. The study's
timeframe was divided into 15 intervals of six months from 1
September 1994 to 28 February 2002. Rofecoxib and celecoxib
were introduced on the provincial drug formulary in April 2000
and meloxicam was introduced in March 2001. The prevalence of
use of NSAIDs in each interval was determined by dividing the
unique number of individuals dispensed any NSAID (either non-selective
NSAIDs or COX 2 inhibitors) by the total number of individuals
alive at the beginning of the interval. Similarly, we examined
hospitalisation rates for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
As secondary endpoints, we examined hospitalisations for myocardial
infarction and heart failure. We standardised all rates for
age and sex. As supplementary analyses, we also examined changes
in the use of gastroprotective agents, oral corticosteroids,
prescription aspirin, and warfarin, since these factors may
be strongly related to upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. We
used time series analysis involving autoregressive integrated
moving average models to evaluate changes over time with the
package SAS 8.2 (SAS, Cary, NC).
5
The prevalence of use of NSAIDs among Ontario's population of older people increased from 14.0% just before the introduction of COX 2 inhibitors to 19.8% by the end of the observation period (figure; P < 0.01), representing an absolute increase of more than 90 000 additional individuals annually using NSAIDs, entirely attributable to the use of COX 2 inhibitors rather than switching from non-selective NSAIDs to COX 2 inhibitors. The rate of hospitalisation for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage was decreasing before the introduction of COX 2 inhibitors, but increased from about 15.4 to 17.0 per 10 000 older persons after their introduction (figure; P < 0.01), representing an absolute increase of more than 650 upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage hospitalisations annually. Other than a small but statistically significant increase in the prevalence of gastroprotective agent use, we saw no significant differences in the use of drugs that might affect upper gastrointestinal risk over expected projections. Also, we saw no significant differences in hospitalisation rates for myocardial infarction or heart failure greater than expected projections.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Age and sex standardised prevalence of the use of NSAIDs and hospitalisation rates for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage over time among elderly people in Ontario
|
|
Comment
In this population based study a 41% rise in NSAID use, entirely
due to increased use of COX 2 inhibitors, was accompanied by
a 10% increase in hospitalisation rates for upper gastrointestinal
haemorrhage. Although we cannot prove causation, we believe
that the striking temporal correlation, biological plausibility,
and lack of any other trends that would explain the association
strongly suggest that the two events are directly related. Coding
practices for hospital admissions for upper gastrointestinal
haemorrhage period did not change significantly during our study.
However, we could not evaluate whether the potential improvement
in population level pain relief offsets the increase in hospitalisations
for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
The findings of this study suggest that even if a new drug is associated with lower side effects than previous drugs in its class at the patient level, a marked increase in its use can be associated with an apparently paradoxical adverse impact on the population.
Contributors: MM, DNJ, GN, PCA, and AL designed the study; MM,
DNJ, PCA, and AK did the study. GN, PCA, and AL advised and
supervised. PCA gave statistical advice. MM is guarantor. Funding:
MM is supported by a New Investigator award from the New Emerging
Teams of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).
DNJ is supported by a New Investigator award from the CIHR and
by the University of Toronto Drug Safety Research Group. GN
is supported by the Mary Trimmer Chair in Geriatric Medicine
Research at the University of Toronto. AL is a senior scientist
of the CIHR. This study was supported by a CIHR operating grant
(MOP-49527) and a CIHR Chronic Disease New Emerging Team programme
grant (NET-54010). The NET programme receives joint sponsorship
from the Canadian Diabetes Association, the Kidney Foundation
of Canada, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the
CIHR Institutes of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes and Circulatory
and Respiratory Health.
Competing interests: MM has done research in an unrelated content area upon the request of an academic institution whose funding was supported by Pharmacia in the past three years, but none of the funding for this study was provided by any pharmaceutical company.
Ethical approval: Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre Ethics Review Board.
This article was posted on bmj.com on 11 May 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38068.716262.F7
References
- Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R, Davis B, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med
2000;343: 1520-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: a randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib long-term arthritis safety study. JAMA
2000;284: 1247-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mamdani M, Rochon PA, Juurlink DN, Kopp A, Anderson GM, Naglie G, et al. Observational study of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in elderly patients given selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ
2002;325: 624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Williams JI, Young W. A summary of studies on the quality of health care administrative databases in Canada. In: Goel V, Williams JI, Anderson GM, Blackstein-Hirsh P, Fooks C, Naylor CD, eds. Patterns of health care in Ontario: the ICES practice atlas. 2nd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association, 1996: 339-45.
- Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL. Econometric models and economic forecasts. 4th ed. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1998: ch 15.
(Accepted 22 January 2004)

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rahme, E., Bardou, M., Dasgupta, K., Toubouti, Y., Ghosn, J., Barkun, A. N.
(2007). Hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among elderly patients using low-dose aspirin: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford)
46: 265-272
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Mamdani, M., Warren, L., Kopp, A., Paterson, J. M., Laupacis, A., Bassett, K., Anderson, G. M.
(2006). Changes in rates of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage after the introduction of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in British Columbia and Ontario. CMAJ
175: 1535-1538
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Paterson, J. M., Laupacis, A., Bassett, K., Anderson, G. M., for the BC-Ontario Pharmacosurveillance for Decisi,
(2006). Using Pharmacoepidemiology To Inform Drug Coverage Policy: Initial Lessons From A Two-Province Collaborative. Health Aff (Millwood)
25: 1436-1443
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
(2005). Taking stock of coxibs. DTB
43: 1-6
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
(2005). Popularity uncovers COX-2 inhibitor side effects. Ann Rheum Dis
64: 94-94
[Full text]
-
Shah, S., Thomas, B.
(2004). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics and gastrointestinal protection in palliative care patients. Palliat Med
18: 739-740
-
(2004). Hit parade. BMJ
329: 298-298
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Paradox, or paradigm?
- K Ian Johnson
bmj.com, 11 Jun 2004
[Full text]
- More gastrointestinal bleeding, but what about heart failure?
- Arnaud Chiolero
bmj.com, 14 Jun 2004
[Full text]
- Comment on Mamdani et. al. BMJ 2004
- Mitchell S. Gandelman
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2004
[Full text]