BMJ  2004;328:989-990 (24 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38050.674826.AE (published 19 March 2004)

Paper

Effectiveness of nicotine patches in relation to genotype in women versus men: randomised controlled trial

¹ Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, ² Cancer Research UK General Practice Research Group, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE

Introduction

The overall effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy could be greater if the therapy were targeted at those most likely to respond. Variants of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2 32806 C/T) have been implicated in the initiation and maintenance of smoking,^{1 2} and these variants may also be related to response to nicotine replacement therapy.³ Additionally, mechanisms of nicotine addiction may differ in men and women.⁴ With this evidence in mind, we examined whether the response to nicotine replacement therapy is modified by sex and genotype.

Participants, methods, and results

A randomised controlled trial of nicotine patches in 1991-2 recruited 1686 heavy smokers ( 15 cigarettes a day).⁵ The participants wore patches for 12 weeks. Abstinence from smoking was confirmed at one week by expired carbon monoxide concentration 10 ppm, and at 12, 24, and 52 weeks by salivary cotinine concentration 20 ng/ml (89% of cases) or by expired carbon monoxide concentration 10 ppm.

In 1999-2000, we contacted 1532 of the 1625 participants still alive; the mean time from trial to follow up was 8.3 years. In all, 752/1532 (49%) gave a blood sample from which DRD2 32806 was successfully typed. Reported abstinence at follow up was confirmed by plasma cotinine concentration 20 ng/ml. Throughout, non-respondents were assumed to be smoking.

Participants were older than non-participants (mean age at entry to trial, 43.0 years 41.5 years; P = 0.002), more likely to be female (59% (445/752) 53% (410/780); P = 0.01), and more likely to have quit for a year in the trial (11% (82) 4% (33), P < 0.0001); 744 (99%) reported their racial background as white.

The variant T allele of the dopamine D2 receptor DRD2 32806 (CT or TT genotype) was found in 41% (183/445) of women and 41% of men (127/307). Within each sex, there was no difference between the genotype groups in age, number of cigarettes a day, or dependency score.

We measured effectiveness of the patches by the relative odds of abstinence for active and placebo patches over five cumulative time periods: one week, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks, and to follow up. Treatment by genotype and sex, and their interaction, was examined in a full logistic regression model. The three way interaction by genotype by sex was significant for all time periods (P = 0.009, P = 0.03, P = 0.006, P = 0.006, P = 0.004 respectively), and we therefore analysed the data for men and women separately.

In women, the effectiveness of the patches differed with genotype at all time points (table). In men, the genotype groups did not differ significantly at any time. In men with CC genotype an apparent trend in effectiveness was in an implausible direction, the patches being most effective long after therapy had stopped. In both sexes, when active and placebo groups were combined, the quit rate was not related to genotype.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Biochemically confirmed abstinence from smoking by sex and DRD2 32806 genotype

 

Comment

In women the effectiveness of nicotine patches seems to be related to genotype. Women with the variant T allele of the dopamine D2 receptor DRD2 32806 showed considerable benefit from patches, whereas those with the more common CC genotype did not. The increased effectiveness reflected a tendency to a higher quit rate with the active patches and a lower quit rate with placebo patches. No significant relation between genotype and patch effectiveness was seen for men.

Modelling showed that the response bias in favour of quitters and of women could not account for our results, as the bias affected the nicotine and placebo groups equally and so cancels out in the odds ratio for patch effectiveness. The results are also not explained by an association between genotype and success at quitting, as this could account for only a marginal difference in odds ratios between genotypes and would affect men and women similarly. We therefore hypothesise that nicotine replacement therapy works through different processes and is subject to different genetic influences in men and women.

---

Papers pp 977,988

This article was posted on bmj.com on 19 March 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38050.674826.AE

We thank Lesley Jones and Alice Fuller for computing help and John Stapleton for valuable comments and suggestions.

Contributors: RW, PY, and M Murphy wrote the protocol and obtained funding. M Munafò and PY devised and carried out the analysis. KH traced subjects and administered the study; SR and SW collected patient data and took blood samples. RW established laboratory procedures; EJ and SG carried out DNA extraction and genotyping. PY wrote the paper, with critical revision by all other authors. PY is the guarantor.

Funding: The study was supported by Cancer Research UK. The sponsors of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Anglia and Oxford Multicentre Research Ethics Committee, and from the 86 local research ethics committees covering the areas of residence of the patients.

References

1. Noble EP, St Jeor ST, Ritchie T, Syndulko K, St Jeor SC, Fitch RJ, et al. D2 dopamine receptor gene and cigarette smoking: a reward gene? Med Hypotheses 1994;42: 257-60.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
2. Comings DE, Ferry L, Bradshaw-Robinson S, Burchette R, Chiu C, Muhleman D. The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene: a genetic risk factor in smoking. Pharmacogenetics 1996;6: 73-9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Johnstone EC, Yudkin PL, Hey K, Roberts SJ, Welch SJ, Murphy MF, et al. Genetic variation in dopaminergic pathways and short term effectiveness of the nicotine patch. Pharmacogenetics 2004;14: 83-90.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Perkins KA, Donny E, Caggiula AR. Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence. Nicotine Tob Res 1999;1: 301-15.
5. Imperial Cancer Research Fund General Practice Research Group. Randomised trial of nicotine patches in general practice: results at one year. BMJ 1994;308: 1476-7.[Free Full Text]

(Accepted 11 December 2003)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy

Tim Coleman, John Britton, and Jim Thornton
BMJ 2004 328: 965-966. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study

Richard P Sargent, Robert M Shepard, and Stanton A Glantz
BMJ 2004 328: 977-980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Mortality among "never smokers" living with smokers: two cohort studies, 1981-4 and 1996-9

Sarah Hill, Tony Blakely, Ichiro Kawachi, and Alistair Woodward
BMJ 2004 328: 988-989. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Munafo, M. R., Johnstone, E. C., Murphy, M. F. G., Aveyard, P. (2009). Lack of association of DRD2 rs1800497 (Taq1A) polymorphism with smoking cessation in a nicotine replacement therapy randomized trial. Nicotine Tob Res 11: 404-407 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Quaak, M., van Schayck, C. P., Knaapen, A. M., van Schooten, F. J. (2009). Genetic variation as a predictor of smoking cessation success. A promising preventive and intervention tool for chronic respiratory diseases?. Eur Respir J 33: 468-480 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Munafo, M. R., Timpson, N. J., David, S. P., Ebrahim, S., Lawlor, D. A. (2009). Association of the DRD2 gene Taq1A polymorphism and smoking behavior: a meta-analysis and new data. Nicotine Tob Res 0: ntn012v1-ntn012 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Uhl, G. R., Liu, Q.-R., Drgon, T., Johnson, C., Walther, D., Rose, J. E., David, S. P., Niaura, R., Lerman, C. (2008). Molecular Genetics of Successful Smoking Cessation: Convergent Genome-Wide Association Study Results. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 683-693 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Munafo, M. R., Johnstone, E. C., Murphy, M. F.G., Aveyard, P. (2008). "Intention to Analyze" in Pharmacogenomics Studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17: 740-741 [Full text]  
• Woolf, S. H. (2007). Priorities to Improve Health Outcomes--Reply. JAMA 297: 2346-2347 [Full text]  
• Johnstone, E. C., Elliot, K. M., David, S. P., Murphy, M. F.G., Walton, R. T., Munafo, M. R. (2007). Association of COMT Val108/158Met Genotype with Smoking Cessation in a Nicotine Replacement Therapy Randomized Trial. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 16: 1065-1069 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Carlsten, C., Burke, W. (2006). Potential for Genetics to Promote Public Health: Genetics Research on Smoking Suggests Caution About Expectations. JAMA 296: 2480-2482 [Full text]  
• Lee, A. M., Tyndale, R. F. (2006). Drugs and genotypes: how pharmacogenetic information could improve smoking cessation treatment. J Psychopharmacol 20: 7-14 [Abstract]  
• Munafo, M. R., Johnstone, E. C., Wileyto, E. P., Shields, P. G., Elliot, K. M., Lerman, C. (2006). Lack of Association of 5-HTTLPR Genotype with Smoking Cessation in a Nicotine Replacement Therapy Randomized Trial.. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15: 398-400 [Full text]  
• Berrettini, W. H., Lerman, C. E. (2005). Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacogenetics of Nicotine Dependence. Am. J. Psychiatry 162: 1441-1451 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Lerman, C., Patterson, F., Berrettini, W. (2005). Treating Tobacco Dependence: State of the Science and New Directions. JCO 23: 311-323 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• O'Gara, C. (2004). Pharmacogenetics and addiction services. Psychiatr. Bull. 28: 426-427 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Reply to: Effectiveness of nicotine patches in relation to genotype in women versus men: randomised controlled trial

Pamela R. Fung, et al.
bmj.com, 21 May 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>