BMJ  2004;328 (24 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7446.0-f

Editor's choice

A commentary on commentaries

Doctors don't worry whether they will continue to have jobs. No matter how successful they may be, illness, disease, pain, and suffering will continue. Medical publishers, in contrast, fret about the future. The people who make their living in the space between authors and readers—that is, editors, publishers, librarians, and various other more mysterious types—may all be rendered redundant as authors go directly to readers courtesy of the world wide web. One defence we have is peer review, but it's a poor, shivering beast—albeit a holy one. Another defence is to "add value," and this is one reason why we publish commentaries—wise words that we commission to complement the original studies that are submitted to us for free. Perhaps because our anxiety about our future is increasing we have in this issue three commentaries, one of which is almost as long as the study on which it comments.

Commentaries often pick up on particular issues—perhaps statistical, ethical, or legal—raised by studies. Occasionally they offer different perspectives from those of the authors, coming perhaps from patients. Sometimes they set the studies in context, although this is more the job of an editorial. Rarely they may severely criticise studies, and we will have agreed to publish the study only if it is accompanied by a commentary.

Terry F Pechacek and Stephen Babb comment (p 980) on the study that shows that a public smoking ban reduced admissions for myocardial infarction in a small, isolated town in Montana (p 977). They point out weaknesses in the study: the absence of data on actual exposures to secondhand smoke; the small size; and the unexpectedly large effect. But the main point of their commentary is to draw readers' attention to the increasing evidence that small exposures to tobacco can cause large increases in the risk of cardiovascular disease.

The commentary by Paul Ruddock addresses that age old medical question of what is normal (p 987). A study from Korea suggests that patients with "high normal" serum aminotransferase concentrations may be at increased risk of liver disease compared with those with "low normal" concentrations (p 983). Korea has high levels of liver disease, and Ruddock considers the implications for countries with lower levels of disease. The answer seems to be that they aren't clear.

The third commentary (p 998) tries to put into a clinical context the systematic reviews that show that analgesic creams and ointments may be useful in treating acute and chronic pain (p 991 and p 995). Martin R Tramèr produces some "practical clinical guidelines" that show that treatments can be useful but reflects on why it is that topical treatments are popular with patients but not doctors. The reason may, he suggests, be lack of evidence. I suspect something more primordial.

These commentaries all, I believe, add value—not least because the authors are willing to enter the tiger country of trying to determine what evidence means. It's so hard.

Richard Smith, editor

rsmith{at}bmj.com


To receive Editor's choice by email each week subscribe via our website: bmj.com/cgi/customalert

Related Articles

How acute and reversible are the cardiovascular risks of secondhand smoke?
Terry F Pechacek and Stephen Babb
BMJ 2004 328: 980-983. [Full Text] [PDF]

It's not just about rubbing—topical capsaicin and topical salicylates may be useful as adjuvants to conventional pain treatment
Martin R Tramèr
BMJ 2004 328: 998. [Full Text] [PDF]

Systematic review of efficacy of topical rubefacients containing salicylates for the treatment of acute and chronic pain
Lorna Mason, R Andrew Moore, Jayne E Edwards, Henry J McQuay, Sheena Derry, and Philip J Wiffen
BMJ 2004 328: 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Systematic review of topical capsaicin for the treatment of chronic pain
Lorna Mason, R Andrew Moore, Sheena Derry, Jayne E Edwards, and Henry J McQuay
BMJ 2004 328: 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: prospective cohort study
Hyeon Chang Kim, Chung Mo Nam, Sun Ha Jee, Kwang Hyub Han, Dae Kyu Oh, and Il Suh
BMJ 2004 328: 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Liver function tests: defining what's normal
Paul Roderick
BMJ 2004 328: 987. [Full Text] [PDF]

Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study
Richard P Sargent, Robert M Shepard, and Stanton A Glantz
BMJ 2004 328: 977-980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Homeopathic Claims for Passive Smoking
Maurice L. Gueret
bmj.com, 23 Apr 2004 [Full text]
Re: Homeopathic Claims for Passive Smoking
Kenneth Campbell
bmj.com, 26 Apr 2004 [Full text]
Automatic indexing - BMJ articles missing on the PubMed index, but present on Web of Science.
Phillip J. Colquitt
bmj.com, 27 Apr 2004 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview