Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:734-737 (27 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7442.734
Jenny Shaw, senior lecturer in forensic psychiatry1, Tim Amos, clinical research fellow1, Isabelle M Hunt, research associate1, Sandra Flynn, research assistant1, Pauline Turnbull, research assistant1, Navneet Kapur, senior lecturer in psychiatry1, Louis Appleby, professor of psychiatry1
1 National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness, Centre for Suicide Prevention, School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
Correspondence to: J Shaw Jennifer.J.Shaw{at}man.ac.uk
Design Longitudinal study and national clinical survey.
Participants People convicted of homicide in England and Wales between 1996 and 1999 and whether the victim was known to the perpetrator.
Setting England and Wales.
Main outcome measure Characteristics of perpetrators of homicides according to whether victims were strangers or not.
Results Stranger homicides increased between 1967 and 1997, both in number and as a proportion of all homicides. No increase was found, however, in the number of perpetrators placed under a hospital order after homicide, whether all homicides or stranger homicides only. 358 of 1594 (22%) homicides were stranger homicides. In these cases the perpetrator was more likely to be male and young. The method of killing was more likely to be by hitting, kicking, or pushing (36% (130 of 358) for victims who were strangers to the perpetrator compared with 14% (145 of 1074) for victims who were known). Perpetrators were less likely to have a history of mental disorder (34%, n = 80
50%, n = 142), a history of contact with mental health services (16%, 37 of 234
24%, 200 of 824), and psychiatric symptoms at the time of the offence (6%, n = 14
18%, n = 143). They were more likely to have a history of drug misuse (47%, n = 93
37%, n = 272); alcohol (56%, n = 94
41%, n = 285) or drugs (24% n = 44
12%, n = 86) were more likely to have contributed to the offence.
Conclusions Stranger homicides have increased, but the increase is not the result of homicides by mentally ill people and therefore the "care in the community" policy. Stranger homicides are more likely to be related to alcohol or drug misuse by young men.
Stranger homicides are those in which perpetrators and victims are unknown to each other. A broader definition, however, is used in the analysis of figures before 1977; this includes those in which the relationship between perpetrator and victim was not established, the assumption being that they did not know each other. In most stranger homicides, both perpetrator and victim are members of the public, but the figures also include cases in which individuals are killed in the course of employment (for example, police officers) and contract or terrorist killings.
Study design
Longitudinal study
Data were obtained from the homicide index for 1967-97. This includes number of convictions for homicide, number of stranger homicides (by the broader definition), and number of hospital orders.
Cross sectional study
The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness has received information from the homicide index since 1996. A full account of the inquiry's methods is given elsewhere.7
We recorded the details of all individuals convicted of homicide in England and Wales during the three years from April 1996. These included personal characteristics of perpetrators and victims and details of the offence, prior convictions, and sentencing. Psychiatric reports were requested from the courts of trial, the Prison Service, the Crown Prosecution Service, and other sources. From these we extracted personal characteristics; clinical history; mental state at the time of the offence; history of alcohol or drug dependence and misuse, and the role these substances played in the offence; and contact with mental health services.
Using
2 tests we compared stranger homicides (excluding being killed in the course of employment) with those in which perpetrators were known to victims. We compared criminological, personal, and clinical variables. If information on a variable was not known for an individual case we omitted this case from the analysis of that variable.
2 = 43.8, df 1, P < 0.001). The number of hospital orders increased neither in total nor in stranger homicides alone. The proportion of homicides leading to a hospital order decreased.
|
In the three year study period, 1594 homicides in the general population were reported to the inquiry. In 358 (22%) cases the victim was a stranger to the perpetrator. The relationship between perpetrator and victim was unknown in 202 cases. Forty people were killed in the course of their employment.
Perpetrators were predominately young men, particularly in stranger homicides (table 2). Such homicides were more likely to be the result of hitting, kicking, or pushing, indicating physical fights. The perpetrators were less likely to receive a verdict of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility or to be placed on a hospital order.
|
Psychiatric reports were obtained in 1168 (73%) cases, including 234 (65% of 358) stranger homicides. In stranger homicides, perpetrators were more likely to have a history of drug misuse, and alcohol and drugs were more likely to have contributed to the offence (table 3). They were less likely to have a lifetime history of mental disorder, symptoms of mental illness at the time of the offence, or previous contact with mental health services.
|
Of the 37 perpetrators of stranger homicides who had ever been in contact with mental health services, 10 had received a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Of these, eight had been in contact with services in the year before the homicide, two in the previous week.
Out findings can be criticised on the basis that both the longitudinal and the cross sectional studies omit homicides that do not lead to conviction, in which homicides by strangers may be over-represented. The cross sectional study was based in part on psychiatric reports prepared for the courts, and these were not available in one third of cases. The loss of these reports is likely to have inflated the proportion of perpetrators with mental illness because reports identifying mental illness are more likely to have been used in court proceedings and retained in court files. A similar proportion of reports was, however, obtained for both stranger and non-stranger homicides, so the values relating to mental illness may be inflated in both groups.
The results of the longitudinal study are consistent with previous studies on the rate of probable mental illness in people convicted of homicide.5 Our findings suggest that stranger homicide is more often associated with alcohol and drug misuse than with severe mental illness. This is also true of non-stranger homicides. In our sample there were 85 perpetrators of homicide with schizophrenia over three years; 12 killed a stranger and eight of these people had been in contact with mental health services in the 12 months before the homicide. In contrast, of 560 perpetrators with a history of alcohol or drug misuse, 124 killed a stranger.
Failings in mental health care have contributed to individual cases, and steps should be taken to prevent this. For example, mental health services should work to prevent the loss of contact and non-compliance with treatment that frequently precede homicide by people with severe mental illness.7 8 Stranger homicides are, however, more often committed by young men under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and a public health approach to homicide prevention should place greater emphasis on reducing alcohol and drug misuse in this group.
|
Contributors: JS, TA, and LA contributed to the design, data collection, data analysis, and drafting the paper. JS and LA are grant holders on the project. IH, SF, PT, and NK contributed to data collection and analysis and drafting the paper. JS will act as guarantor for the paper. The guarantor accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.
Competing interests: LA is currently seconded part time to the Department of Health as National Director for Mental Health and in this capacity provides advice on mental health policy.
Ethical approval: This study was approved by the multi-centre research ethics committee.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses