BMJ  2004;328 (28 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.0-e

Does animal research benefit humans?

Animal studies are often of poor quality, and their contribution to clinical medicine requires rigorous evaluation. Pound and colleagues analysed 25 systematic reviews of animal studies and found only six investigating how animal research had informed clinical research. The methodological quality of the studies was poor, some were run simultaneously with clinical trials, and in some cases negative findings from animal trials did not prevent subsequent clinical trials. Systematic reviews of animal studies can provide important insights into the validity and value of animal research, say the authors, and should precede clinical trials.

Credit: RAGUET/PHANIE/REX


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview