BMJ  2004;328 (24 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.0

Prospective collection of data provides better assessment of risk

Prospective collection of data may be the best method to assess the rate of adverse and preventable events and the impact of risk reduction programmes. In a study on 778 patients, Michel and colleagues (p 199) compared the effectiveness, reliability, and acceptability of estimating rates of adverse events, and of preventable adverse events, using three methods: cross sectional, prospective, and retrospective. The prospective and retrospective methods identified similar numbers of medical and surgical cases (70% and 66%), but the prospective method identified more preventable cases, had good reliability, and an acceptable workload. The cross sectional method had a large number of false positives and identified none of the most serious events. No method was appropriate for obstetrics.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals

Philippe Michel, Jean Luc Quenon, Anne Marie de Sarasqueta, and Olivier Scemama
BMJ 2004 328: 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>