Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:1275-1276 (29 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1275
Ian Morris, consultant rheumatologist1, George Varughese, senior house officer1, Peter Mattingly, consultant rheumatologist1
1 Department of Rheumatology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, Northamptonshire NN16 8UZ
Correspondence to: I Morris ian.morris{at}kgh.nhs.uk
Case 2An 88 year old woman with a history of ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive cardiac failure, chronic renal failure, hypertension, and osteoarthritis was admitted with pain in her right knee. Investigations led to a diagnosis of acute gouty monoarthritis (serum urea 27.1 mmol/l, serum creatinine 236 µmol/l, and serum uric acid 920 mmol/l). She was given 1 mg colchicine and then 500 µg every eight hours (a reduced dose because the BNF advises caution with renal and cardiac impairment). Within two days she developed nausea and vomiting. We stopped colchicine for 24 hours and then resumed with 500 µg twice a day. This improved her right knee pain without further nausea.
Case 3A 56 year old man in general good health with recurrent acute gout found that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were ineffective and productive of severe indigestion; therefore he was given 1 mg colchicine and 500 µg every three hours for acute attacks. With this regimen, he had diarrhoea and sickness, and the acute attacks of gout continued. We reduced colchicine to 500 µg two or three times a day, which was effective without adverse event.
The BNF states that colchicine is probably at least as effective as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in an acute attack of gout (although to our knowledge only one double blind placebo controlled study has been done with colchicine in gout,2 and none has been done for NSAIDs and gout). The BNF also states that colchicine does not induce fluid retention and can therefore be used in heart failure, and it can be given to patients on anticoagulants. Thus the non-specialist is encouraged to use colchicine, especially when other treatments such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or sometimes steroids (whether local or systematic) are inappropriate or ineffective. The BNF cautions about gastrointestinal disease, cardiac, hepatic, and renal insufficiency, but the only contraindication noted is pregnancy.
Although non-specialists are likely to prescribe the regimen as given, many rheumatologists have never used such high doses because they were trained to use low dosages even in acute gout. Low dosages were first advocated for the long term treatment of gout in the 1930s and are now used as prophylaxis while treating with allopurinol or uricosuric agents (using a lower dosage of colchicine during induction of urate reducing drugs is already mentioned in the BNF).3 Even though lower doses of colchicine for acute gout were advocated in the ABC of Rheumatology in 1995,4 a recent editorial in the BMJ still advocated the traditional high dose regimen.5
Empirical studies by rheumatologists over many years have shown the effectiveness of low doses of colchicine for acute gout without adverse events. We do not advocate an increase in the use of colchicine because non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are usually highly effective, but we think lower dosages of colchicine should be publicised as being effective and much less likely to produce side effects than traditional high dose regimens. The side effects of nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea are particularly difficult to endure in patients who are in pain, incapacitated, and immobile from acute gouty arthritis.
We suggest that in acute gouty arthritis colchicine should be used at a dose of 500 µg three times a day or less frequently, especially in those with renal impairment. In the absence of any other recent studies the BNF should provide this information which would benefit many patients.
Contributors: PM and IM were involved in managing the patients and thought it worth while promoting the use of lower doses of colchicine. GV wrote the case histories and did the staff survey. All authors wrote the article. IM is guarantor.
Competing interests: None declared.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses