Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:851 (11 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7419.851-a
Some inconsistencies in confidence intervals appeared in this paper by Gordon C S Smith and colleagues (9 August, pp 313-6). In the third to last sentence of the results section of the abstract, the confidence interval for the adjusted odds ratio of 2.2 (for a short interpregnancy interval being a risk factor for extremely preterm birth) is 1.4 to 3.6 [not 1.3 to 4.6]. In the final sentence of the third paragraph of the Results section of the main article, the confidence intervals for the adjusted odds ratios given should be 1.4 to 3.6 [not 1.3 to 4.6] and 1.3 to 2.0 [1.2 to 2.2]. However, all these data were correct in table 2 in the abridged version and in table 3 in the full version (bmj.com).
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?