Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327 (23 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7412.0-d
In the Education and Debate section of this week's theme issue on indigenous health, authors from New Zealand, Canada, and Australia share their best practices and proposals for change. Foliaki and Pearce (p 437) discuss how the prevention and control of diabetes in Pacific people must take account of the political and economic conditions for improving health, as well as emphasising the role of individuals in changing their lifestyles and health habits. Bloomfield and Logan (p 439) argue that a quality improvement framework is a better approach to healthcare priority setting and funding decisions than is the explicit prioritisation processes that have recently taken place in New Zealand. McPherson and colleagues (p 443) show how developments at national and local levels have reduced the disparities in life expectancies and health among indigenous people in New Zealand. On p 445 Cunningham and colleagues discuss the tripartite memorandum of understanding on indigenous health research signed by Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, which aims to share information and expertise on health research funding.
|
|
Credit: AP PHOTO/LYNNE SLADKY
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?