Table 1 Summary of significance of outcome measures for two dimensional (2-D) ultrasound guidance compared with landmark method for catheterisation


Internal jugular vein

Subclavian vein

Femoral vein

No of placements

No of placements

No of placements

Variable

2-D ultrasound guidance

Landmark method

Effect size (95% CI)

P value

2-D ultrasound guidance

Landmark method

Effect size (95% CI)

P value

Doppler ultrasound guidance

Landmark method

Effect size (95% CI)

P value

Adults

























Relative risk:

























Failed catheter placement

296

312

0.14 (0.06 to 0.33)

<0.0001

25

27

0.14 (0.04 to 0.57)

0.006

20

20

0.29 (0.07 to 1.21)

0.09

Complication with placement

284

295

0.43 (0.22 to 0.87)

0.02

25

27

0.10 (0.01 to 0.71)

0.02





NA

NA

Failure on first attempt

162

179

0.59 (0.39 to 0.88)

0.009





NA

NA





NA

NA

Mean No:

























Attempts to successful catheterisation

131

136

-1.50 (-2.53 to -0.47)

0.004





NA

NA

20

20

-2.70 (-5.26 to -0.14)

0.04

Seconds to successful catheterisation

180

192

-69.33 (-92.36 to -46.31)

<0.0001





NA

NA

20

20

-3.20 (-43.27 to 36.87)

0.9

Infants

























Relative risk:

























Failed placement

79

88

0.15 (0.03 to 0.64)

0.01





NA

NA





NA

NA

Complication with placement

79

88

0.27 (0.08 to 0.91)

0.03





NA

NA





NA

NA

Failure on first attempt





NA

NA





NA

NA





NA

NA

Mean No:

























Attempts to successful catheterisation

43

52

-2.00 (-2.78 to -1.22)

<0.0001





NA

NA





NA

NA

Seconds to successful catheterisation

59

68

-349.38 (-801.89 to 103.13)

0.13





NA

NA





NA

NA

NA=not available. All outcomes favoured ultrasound guidance (relative risk <1).




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ