BMJ  2003;327:131-132 (19 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7407.131

Paper

Prevalence of five common clinical abnormalities in very elderly people: population based cross sectional study

¹ Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of General Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, Netherlands, ² University of Glasgow, Department of Medical Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER

Introduction

As the prevalence of disease rises with age, the number of people with unidentified abnormalities is also likely to increase. We assessed the number of previously known and newly identified patients with anaemia, diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension in a population based sample of 85 year old people.

Participants, methods, and results

The study design and baseline characteristics of the 599 participants in the Leiden 85 plus study have been published elsewhere.¹ All participants gave informed consent. We used standard laboratory techniques to identify anaemia, diabetes mellitus, and thyroid dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation, including flutter, was identified on an electrocardiogram. Hypertension was identified by averaging two standardised blood pressure readings measured with a sphygmomanometer at two separate visits. For 40 people a blood sample, electrocardiogram, or blood pressure measurement was not available. Furthermore, we excluded all 31 residents of nursing homes because they do not voluntarily consult a general practitioner but are continuously monitored by a nursing home physician.

We obtained the medical history of the 528 remaining people from their general practitioner. By including a local general practitioner (JG) in our research team, we managed to get all 60 general practitioners in Leiden to cooperate with us. Moreover, all pharmacies in Leiden provided detailed information on prescribed drugs for all patients. All drugs were encoded according to the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification.²

Abnormalities were considered known when a positive medical history was present or when patients were currently using one of the following ATC coded drugs: B03 for anaemia, A10 for diabetes mellitus, H03 for thyroid dysfunction, B01AA04/B01AA07 combined with C01AA05 for atrial fibrillation, or C02, C03, C07, C08, or C09 for hypertension.

The definitions for newly identified clinical abnormalities were: haemoglobin < 130 g/l (< 8.1 mmol/l) in men or < 120 g/l (< 7.5 mmol/l) in women for anaemia³; non-fasting serum glucose concentrations > 11.0 mmol/l for diabetes mellitus; serum thyroid stimulating hormone < 0.3 mU/l and serum free thyroxin > 24 pmol/l (hyperthyroidism) or thyroid stimulating hormone > 4.8 mU/l and free thyroxin < 10 pmol/l (hypothyroidism) for thyroid dysfunction; Minnesota codes 8-3-1 or 8-3-2⁴ for atrial fibrillation or flutter; and systolic pressure > 160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure > 95 mm Hg for hypertension.⁵

Among the 528 participants 38 were known to have anaemia, 77 had diabetes mellitus, 32 had thyroid dysfunction, 32 had atrial fibrillation, and 304 had hypertension (table). We newly identified 118 with anaemia, 9 with diabetes mellitus, 6 with thyroid dysfunction, 23 with atrial fibrillation, and 73 with hypertension (table). Over 90% of all participants, except for those with newly identified atrial fibrillation, had consulted their general practitioner at least once in the year before the study.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Number (percentage) of people previously known and newly identified with clinical abnormalities in population of 528 people aged 85 years and their contact with general practitioner in year before study

 

Comment

Using information from general practitioners and pharmacy records combined with five simple and readily available procedures we have obtained reliable estimates of the prevalence of five common clinical abnormalities in very elderly people. We found a considerable number with previously undetected anaemia and hypertension but fewer with previously undetected thyroid dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus. We have shown that our criteria for anaemia, diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, and hypertension are adequate for elderly people and can serve as guidelines for clinicians treating older patients. Experienced staff reviewed all automated interpretations and codings of electrocardiograms for atrial fibrillation so we consider that our interpretation of this abnormality is completely reliable. In conclusion, we have shown that it is feasible to use these investigative procedures in an elderly population to provide important quantitative information for future discussions on screening elderly people.

---

Contributors: AJMdC, JG, and RGJW designed the study. AJMdC and YKOT performed the statistical analysis. PWM analysed ECG recordings. All authors interpreted the results and contributed to writing the paper. AJMdC is guarantor for the study.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: The Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Centre approved the study.

References

1. Von Faber M, Bootsma-van der Wiel A, van Exel E, Gussekloo J, Lagaay AM, van Dongen E, et al. Successful aging in the oldest old. Who can be characterized as successfully aged? Arch Intern Med 2001;161: 2694-700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drugs Statistics Methodology, 1996.
3. Izaks GJ, Westendorp RGJ, Knook DL. The definition of anaemia in older persons. JAMA 1999;18: 714-7.
4. Macfarlane PW, Latif S. Automated serial ECG comparison based on the Minnesota code. J Electrocardiol 1996;29(suppl): 29-34.
5. Topol EJ, Califf RM, Isner, J, Prystowsky EN, Serruys PW, Swain JL, et al. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998.

(Accepted June 10, 2003)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Screening 85 plus- justification unclear

Egbert Pravinkumar
bmj.com, 18 Jul 2003 [Full text]

What is a normal blood count?What to do with abnormals?

john sharvill
bmj.com, 21 Jul 2003 [Full text]

Re: What is a normal blood count?What to do with abnormals?

dougal jeffries
bmj.com, 25 Jul 2003 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>