BMJ  2003;327:33-35 (5 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33

Learning in practice

The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect

¹ Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada M5G 1VJ

A large gulf remains between what we know and what we practise. Eisenberg and Garzon point to widespread variation in the use of aspirin, calcium antagonists, blockers, and anti-ischaemic drugs in the United States, Europe, and Canada despite good evidence on their best use.¹ Such variation is common not only internationally but within countries.² Large gaps also exist between best evidence and practice in the implementation of guidelines. Failure to follow best evidence highlights issues of underuse, overuse, and misuse of drugs³ and has led to widespread interest in the safety of patients.⁴

Not surprisingly, many attempts have been made to reduce the gap between evidence and practice. These have included educational strategies to alter practitioners' behaviour⁵ and organisational and administrative interventions. We explore three constructs: continuing medical education (CME), continuing professional development (CPD), and (the newest of the three) knowledge translation (box). Knowledge translation both subsumes and broadens the concepts of CME and CPD and has the potential to improve understanding of, and overcome the barriers to, implementing evidence based practice.

Concepts of CME and CPD

Continuing medical education
CME refers to education after certification and licensure. It is arguably the most complex, and clearly the longest, phase of medical education. Most physicians think of continuing medical education in terms of the traditional medical conference, with rows of tables, pitchers of ice water, green table cloths, and a lecturer at the front of the room.⁷ Many accreditation systems in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada value attendance at such activities. This reinforces the teacher driven nature of continuing medical education, which gives little attention to the concept of professional development.

"Knowledge translation is defined as the exchange, synthesis and ethically sound application of knowledge—within a complex system of interactions among researchers and users—to accelerate the capture of the benefits of research... through improved health, more effective services and products, and a strengthened health care system."6

Summary points CME and CPD are primarily teacher and learner driven and are unable to address questions of population health or attend to issues of the clinical environment Knowledge translation offers a more holistic construct, subsuming and building on CME and CPD Knowledge translation is set within the practice of health care and focuses on changing health outcomes using evidence based clinical knowledge Knowledge translation can draw on people from many disciplines, including informatics, social and educational psychology, organisational theory, and patient and public education, to help close the gap between evidence and practice

Continuing professional development
CPD embodies both professional learning and personal growth. It incorporates much of the theory and practice of adult learning,⁸ self directed learning,⁹ reflective practice,¹⁰ and other models. It also offers the possibility of embracing topics beyond those included in traditional medical education—for example, bio-ethics, business management, and communication skills—topics rarely included in continuing medical education programmes.¹¹ Although the focus on subjective, learner centred curriculums is laudable, it means that continuing professional development can contribute only marginally to improving public health.

Limits of CME and CPD
The effects of CME and CPD have been extensively studied.¹² Although it is an unstable and imperfect database,¹³ the literature shows that most passive educational activities are poor at changing physicians' behaviour. The most effective strategies tend to be more active (such as reminders or educational outreach visits); multiple¹⁴; based on accurate assessment of need^{15 16}; and aimed at overcoming barriers to change.¹⁷ These strategies are not the staple of most providers of CME and CPD. Furthermore, the effectiveness of such methods may be limited by the target (primarily physicians), settings (lecture halls), cost recovery nature (derived largely from participant registration and pharmaceutical contributions), and the process (not outcome) based accreditation principles of these activities.

Case for knowledge translation

If education and persuasion of doctors cannot close the gap between evidence and practice, other strategies are needed. We believe that knowledge translation is an important tool. Knowledge translation includes groups other than doctors and investigates issues more comprehensively than CME and CPD (table 1). Below we describe how knowledge translation differs from CME and CPD and why it is more effective in producing change.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1 Differentiating features of continuing medical education (CME), continuing professional development (CPD), and knowledge translation

 

Settings and tools—Since knowledge translation focuses on health outcomes and changing behaviour, it is set in the site of practice and its social, organisational, and policy environment rather than in learning situations. Furthermore, it identifies best evidence and pathways that make it easier for the target individual or group to follow this evidence. The production of these aids to knowledge translation, called tools or toolkits, is commonplace.¹⁸

The targets of the process of knowledge translation are different from those of CME and CPD. These two models both focus on groups of physicians seeking to accrue credits, although CPD may permit a greater emphasis on team and other group learning.¹⁹ Knowledge translation, however, allows attention to be given to all possible participants in healthcare practices, including patients, consumers, and policy makers.²⁰ Few models of CPD include patients.²¹

Content—The traditional clinical content of CME has given way to more practice based behaviours encompassed by CPD. In turn, knowledge translation builds on these areas, primarily by using evidence based research. Furthermore, as knowledge translation is less learner driven than CME and CPD, it permits a greater emphasis on initiatives to improve population health such as screening, early diagnosis, and preventive measures.

Primary operating models—In CME, the major driver (despite the conscientious efforts of CME providers) remains the teacher, using 50 year old planning models.²² CPD seems to be guided by more self directed or organisational learning principles. Both are predicated on a simple linear model linking learning to relicensing and recertification and only tangentially to performance or healthcare outcomes. In contrast, knowledge translation reflects the considerations of both the practitioner-learner and the educational or clinical policy provider or healthcare system.⁶ This more holistic view makes it easier to close the gap between evidence and practice (see below).

Interdisciplinarity—Given the multidimensional problems inherent in closing the care gap, any studies of knowledge translation must involve people from all relevant disciplines. Models of CME and CPD have benefited from the expertise of educators, clinicians, social and educational psychologists, for example. Knowledge translation can be enriched by people with training in informatics, patient education, organisational learning, social marketing, continuous quality improvement, and a host of others.

Models of knowledge translation

Many different models of implementing change have been described,^19–25 but we have chosen two to illustrate how knowledge translation works in closing the gap between evidence and practice. The perspective of the targeted consumer (practitioner, team, policy maker, patient, or population) is represented by a model developed by Pathman et al, which marks progress from awareness, agreement, adoption, to adherence with evidence based practice.²⁶ The perspective of the effector arm (the healthcare or educational system) is illustrated by Green et al's health promotion model.²⁷ Here, interventions work in three ways:

• To predispose to change by increasing knowledge or skills
  
• To enable the change by promoting conducive conditions in the practice and elsewhere
  
• To reinforce the change, once it is made.
  

Table 2 shows a blend of these two models with our best guesses at what interventions might be effective at each stage of the change process.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2 Pathman-PRECEED model for knowledge translation

 

Although much of this model is as yet intuitive and untested, evidence exists for the validity of some of its components. One recent example illustrates many principles of a holistic knowledge translation process. Tu and colleagues reported a sizeable increase in ramipril prescribing in Ontario as a result of the HOPE study.²⁸ Some knowledge translation activities included in the model (table 2) enabled the increase in prescribing. Firstly, awareness of the success of preventing cardiovascular events in patients at high risk was achieved by widespread media coverage of the trial followed by national specialist continuing medical education events and journal reporting. Secondly, agreement with the outcome was enabled by the fact that many of the opinion leaders in Ontario's cardiology community were trial investigators and participants. Thirdly, adoption and adherence were facilitated and reinforced by promotion of the drug by the pharmaceutical industry through marketing practices and hosting small group events.

Next steps

We recognise that our arguments for knowledge translation need to be treated cautiously. Firstly, much of the evidence we have used derives from studies of changing the performance of physicians and health professionals. These studies are often less than robust and not intended for application to patients or policy makers. Secondly, the manner in which we have chosen and applied definitions and models of interventions has been somewhat arbitrary. Thirdly, the case of ramipril prescribing in Ontario is a relatively simplistic innovation; other more complex actions may take different pathways or exemplify different models.

Despite these reservations, we believe that the concept of knowledge translation will prove to be valuable in promoting the rapid uptake of evidence based knowledge by the public, patients, policy makers, and clinicians. Further research is needed to debate and test our model, filling in the empty cells in table 2, extending the dialogue, and broadening the field. We also need to determine which clinical domains or settings are most suitable for applying knowledge translation and which interventions change performance and healthcare outcomes. Training in quantitative, qualitative, and patient centred research methods will be essential to this process.

---

Competing interests: None declared.

References

1. Eisenberg MJ, Garzon P. Use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the United States, Europe, and Canada. Am J Cardiol 1997;79: 867-72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
2. Wennberg DE, Kellett MA, Dickens JD, Malenka DJ, Keilson LM, Keller RB. The association between local diagnostic testing intensity and invasive cardiac procedures. JAMA 1996;275: 1161-4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA 1998;280: 1000-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
5. Haynes RB, Davis DA, McKibbon A, Tugwell P. A critical appraisal of the efficacy of continuing medical education. JAMA 1984;251: 61-4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation framework. www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/about_cihr/organization/knowledge_translation/kt_framework_prelim_e.shtml#definition (accessed 26 August, 2002).
7. Miller GE. Continuing medical education for what? Med Educ 1967;42: 320-6.
8. Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA, Holton E. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 5th ed. Houston, TX: Gulf, 1998.
9. Candy PC. Self-direction for life-long learning: a comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
10. Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
11. Davis DA, Barnes BE, Fox RD. The horizon of continuing professional development—five questions in knowledge translation. In: Davis DA, Barnes BE, Fox RD, eds. The continuing professional development of physicians. Chicago, IL: AMA Publications, 2002: 9-24.
12. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39: II2-45.[Web of Science][Medline]
13. Mowatt G, Grimshaw JM, Davis DA, Mazmanian PE. Getting evidence into practice: the work of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC). J Contin Educ Health Prof 2001;21: 55-60.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Solberg LI. Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn't tell us. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000;26: 525-37.[Medline]
15. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274: 700-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Sibley JC, Sackett DL, Neufeld V, Gerrard B, Rudnick KV, Fraser W. A randomized trial of continuing medical education. N Engl J Med 1982;306: 511-5.[Abstract]
17. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282: 1458-65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. DiCenso A, Virani T, Bajnok I, Borycki E, Davies B, Graham I, et al. A toolkit to facilitate the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in healthcare settings. Hosp Q 2002;5: 55-60.[Medline]
19. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
20. Vinicor F, Cohen SJ, Mazzuca SA, Moorman N, Wheeler M, Kuebler T, et al. DIABEDS: a randomized trial of the effects of physician and/or patient education on diabetes patient outcomes. J Chronic Dis 1987;40: 345-56.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW. Changing and learning in the lives of physicians. New York: Praeger Publications, 1989.
22. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.
23. Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA 2001;286: 2578-85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
25. Geertsma R, Parker RC, Whitbourne SK. How physicians view the process of change in their practice behavior. J Med Educ 1982;57: 752-61.[Web of Science][Medline]
26. Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, Freeman VA, Koch GG. The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance: the case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care 1996;34: 873-89.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
27. Green LW, Kreuter M, Deeds S, Partridge K. Health education planning: a diagnostic approach. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Press, 1980.
28. Tu K, Mamdani MM, Jacka RM, Forde NJ, Rothwell DM, Tu JV. The striking effect of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) on ramipril prescribing in Ontario. CMAJ 2003;168: 553-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

(Accepted April 29, 2003)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

A multifaceted strategy for implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in two emergency departments

Taryn Bessen, Robyn Clark, Sepehr Shakib, and Geoffrey Hughes
BMJ 2009 339: b3056. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Effect of educational outreach to nurses on tuberculosis case detection and primary care of respiratory illness: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Lara R Fairall, Merrick Zwarenstein, Eric D Bateman, Max Bachmann, Carl Lombard, Bosielo P Majara, Gina Joubert, Rene G English, Angeni Bheekie, Dingie van Rensburg, Pat Mayers, Annatjie C Peters, and Ronald D Chapman
BMJ 2005 331: 750-754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

From publication to change

Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Knowledge translation helps close a gap
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Rogers, J. D., Martin, F. H., NCDDR Knowledge Translation Task Force, (2009). Knowledge Translation in Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Lessons From the Application of Knowledge Value Mapping to the Case of Accessible Currency. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 20: 110-126 [Abstract]  
• Schreiber, J., Stern, P., Marchetti, G., Provident, I. (2009). Strategies to Promote Evidence-Based Practice in Pediatric Physical Therapy: A Formative Evaluation Pilot Project. ptjournal 89: 918-933 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bessen, T., Clark, R., Shakib, S., Hughes, G. (2009). A multifaceted strategy for implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in two emergency departments. BMJ 339: b3056-b3056 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Graham, I. (2009). Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ 181: 165-168 [Full text]  
• Ward, V., House, A., Hamer, S. (2009). Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy 14: 156-164 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Smylie, J., Kaplan-Myrth, N., McShane, K., Metis Nation of Ontario-Ottawa Council, , Pikwakanagan First Nation,, , Tungasuvvingat Inuit Family Resource Centre, (2009). Indigenous Knowledge Translation: Baseline Findings in a Qualitative Study of the Pathways of Health Knowledge in Three Indigenous Communities in Canada. Health Promot Pract 10: 436-446 [Abstract]  
• Davis, D., Bordage, G., Moores, C. L. K., Bennett, N., Marinopoulos, S. S., Mazmanian, P. E., Dorman, T., McCrory, D. (2009). The Science of Continuing Medical Education: Terms, Tools, and Gaps: Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest 135: 8S-16S [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wright, F. C., Gagliardi, A. R., Law, C. H. L., Last, L. D., Klevan, A. E., Hongjinda, S., Stitt, L. W., Klar, N., Ryan, D. P., Smith, A. J. (2008). A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Lymph Node Assessment in Stage II Colon Cancer. Arch Surg 143: 1050-1055 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Straus, S. E, Holroyd-Leduc, J. (2008). Knowledge-to-action cycle. Evid. Based Med. 13: 98-100 [Full text]  
• Grunfeld, E. (2008). Primary Care Physicians and Oncologists Are Players on the Same Team. JCO 26: 2246-2247 [Full text]  
• Krones, T., Keller, H., Sonnichsen, A., Sadowski, E.-M., Baum, E., Wegscheider, K., Rochon, J., Donner-Banzhoff, N. (2008). Absolute Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Shared Decision Making in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Fam Med 6: 218-227 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hendricson, W. D., Anderson, E., Andrieu, S. C., Chadwick, D. G., Cole, J. R., George, M. C., Glickman, G. N., Glover, J. F., Goldberg, J. S., Haden, N. K., Kalkwarf, K. L., Meyerowitz, C., Neumann, L. M., Pyle, M., Tedesco, L. A., Valachovic, R. W., Weaver, R. G., Winder, R. L., Young, S. K. (2007). Does Faculty Development Enhance Teaching Effectiveness?. J Dent Educ 71: 1513-1533 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Menon-Nair, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Ogourtsova, T. (2007). Occupational Therapists' Identification, Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect During Stroke Rehabilitation in Canada. Stroke 38: 2556-2562 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Currow, D. C, Abernethy, A. P, Shelby-James, T. M, Phillips, P. A (2006). The impact of conducting a regional palliative care clinical study. Palliat Med 20: 735-743 [Abstract]  
• Cook, J. A. (2006). Employment Barriers for Persons With Psychiatric Disabilities: Update of a Report for the President's Commission. Psychiatr. Serv. 57: 1391-1405 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Roumie, C. L., Elasy, T. A., Greevy, R., Griffin, M. R., Liu, X., Stone, W. J., Wallston, K. A., Dittus, R. S., Alvarez, V., Cobb, J., Speroff, T. (2006). Improving blood pressure control through provider education, provider alerts, and patient education: a cluster randomized trial.. ANN INTERN MED 145: 165-175 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Menon-Nair, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Robertson, E. (2006). Assessment of unilateral spatial neglect post stroke in Canadian acute care hospitals: are we neglecting neglect?. Clin Rehabil 20: 623-634 [Abstract]  
• Thamlikitkul, V., Indranoi, A. (2006). Switching from heparinized saline flush to normal saline flush for maintaining peripheral venous catheter patency.. Int J Qual Health Care 18: 183-185 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kornitzer, B. S., Manace, L. C., Fischberg, D. J., Leipzig, R. M. (2006). Prevalence of Meperidine Use in Older Surgical Patients. Arch Surg 141: 76-81 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Fairall, L. R, Zwarenstein, M., Bateman, E. D, Bachmann, M., Lombard, C., Majara, B. P, Joubert, G., English, R. G, Bheekie, A., van Rensburg, D., Mayers, P., Peters, A. C, Chapman, R. D (2005). Effect of educational outreach to nurses on tuberculosis case detection and primary care of respiratory illness: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 331: 750-754 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Feinberg, A. N., Soyode, O. (2005). A 1999 Quality Improvement Initiative--Reassessment in 2004. CLIN PEDIATR 44: 527-530 [Abstract]  
• Mann, H., London, A. J., Mann, J. (2005). Equipoise in the Enhanced Supression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Trial (ESPRIT): a critical appraisal. Clin Trials 2: 233-243 [Abstract]  
• Mold, J. W., Peterson, K. A. (2005). Primary Care Practice-Based Research Networks: Working at the Interface Between Research and Quality Improvement. Ann Fam Med 3: S12-S20 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Glasziou, P., Haynes, B. (2005). The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid. Based Nurs. 8: 36-38 [Full text]  
• Glasziou, P., Haynes, B. (2005). The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid. Based Med. 10: 4-7 [Full text]  
• Roumie, C. L., Grogan, E. L., Falbe, W., Awad, J., Speroff, T., Dittus, R. S., Elasy, T. A. (2004). A Three-Part Intervention To Change the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Response to New Evidence. ANN INTERN MED 141: 118-125 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Straus, S. E (2004). What's the E for EBM?. BMJ 328: 535-536 [Full text]  
• Margolis, P. A, Lannon, C. M, Stuart, J. M, Fried, B. J, Keyes-Elstein, L., Moore, D. E Jr (2004). Practice based education to improve delivery systems for prevention in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ 328: 388- [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Shortening the journey AND making it more fun

Chris Manning
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2003 [Full text]

Filling in the empty cells

Brian S Alper
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2003 [Full text]

KNOWLEDGE MARKETING FOR BEHAVIOUR CHANGE IN HEALTH PROVIDERS

Kayode A. Odusote
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2003 [Full text]

Opinion makers

Vivienne St Clair
bmj.com, 22 Jan 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>