Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1398 (21 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1398
EDITORWe read with interest the clinical review by Rymer et al on making decisions about hormone replacement.1 The article provides a useful and informed guide to the indications for hormone replacement and a helpful analysis of the risks and benefits.
We take issue, however, on one important point. As a surgical oncology team specialising in the treatment of breast cancer we believe that it is important to point out that the therapeutic value of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues in the treatment of breast cancer is based on their suppression of ovarian function and the consequent reduction in the concentrations of circulating oestrogen in premenopausal women whose tumours are oestrogen receptor positive.2 3 In these women preparations containing oestrogen should not be used since their use will compromise the value and efficacy of treatment for breast cancer.
The use of hormone replacement in women who have been treated at some time in the past for breast cancer may well be safe, but it should not be used concurrently with treatments aimed at ovarian suppression.
Christopher P Hinton, consultant surgeon
christopherhinton{at}tiscali.co.uk
Claire Coventry, clinical assistant, Bridget Borrowclough, clinical assistant
Princess Royal Hospital NHS Trust, Telford, Shropshire TF1 6TF
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.