Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1377-1378 (21 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1377
Claudio Terzano, professor1, Angelo Petroianni, respiratory physician1
1 Respiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, University of Rome (La Sapienza), Rome, Italy
Correspondence to: Claudio Terzano Via Ugo Bartolomei 18, Rome 00136, Italy cterzano{at}tin.it
In December 2001 he had reported fever (38°C), accompanied by mucopurulent nasal secretion and pain in his forehead. X ray pictures of the paranasal sinuses showed maxillary sinusitis on the right side and hypertrophy of the turbinates. The general practitioner prescribed combined amoxicillin (875 mg) and clavulanic acid (125 mg) twice daily for seven days, followed by clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily for a further seven days. Figure 1 shows the patient's course of treatment. At the end of this treatment period the patient reported dry cough and mild dyspnoea. Chest x ray pictures showed pulmonary consolidations localised at the right apex.
|
A few days later he had a new episode of fever (38.5°C) and was admitted to the infectious diseases department of a hospital. His blood eosinophil count was 1.43 x 109/l (14%) and his erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 52 mm in first hour. Results of faecal examination (parasites), throat culture (swab specimen), haemoculture, and the purified protein derivative tuberculin test were negative. He was treated with cefotaxime (1 g as intravenous injection) three times a day and clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily. After a week of treatment he no longer had fever, his asthmatic symptoms improved mildly, and his peripheral eosinophil count was 3.74 x 109/l (29%). Twelve days later, while he was still taking antibiotics, fever (39°C) returned, accompanied by dyspnoea and wheezing. His eosinophil count worsened, to 5.17 x 109/l (35%). Computerised tomography of his chest showed bilateral peripheral pulmonary infiltrates (figure 2).
|
A sputum test indicated eosinophilia, and serum IgE levels for parasites and aspergillus were negative. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed eosinophilia. The patient was referred to our lung unit, where antibiotic treatment was immediately withdrawn. Prednisone 25 mg twice daily, fluticasone propionate 250 µg from a metered dose inhaler (two puffs twice daily), formoterol 12 µg from a metered dose inhaler (one puff twice daily), and ranitidine 150 mg taken orally once daily were prescribed instead. A few days later his eosinophil count reduced dramatically to 0.27 x 109/l (1%).
Two weeks later his eosinophil count was 0.92 x 109/l (8%). Lung function tests showed a moderate obstructive ventilatory defect, accompanied by a reduction in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 59.9% of predicted value, ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity 69.3%, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) 56.3%, and ratio of DLCO to alveolar volume 68.5%. Diffuse wheezing was detected in both lungs.
After a month his general condition improved. The dosage of prednisone was reduced to a maintenance dosage of 5 mg twice a day. His eosinophil count fell to 0.53 x 109/l (7%). Computed tomography of his chest showed a complete recovery of the pulmonary consolidations (figure 2). Lung function tests showed an improvement of the obstructive defect, accompanied by a normal carbon monoxide transfer factor (FEV1 89.1%, ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity 89.5%, DLCO 78.1%, and ratio of DLCO to alveolar volume 86.8% of predicted values). A bronchodilator (salbutamol) response test showed an increase in FEV1 of 770 ml, a 22% increase from the baseline value.
In April 2002 his general practitioner prescribed clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for the onset of rhinorrhoea accompanied by headache. Three days after the start of treatment the patient developed fever (37.2°C) and mild dyspnoea with eosinophilia (eosinophil count 1.84 x 109/l (17%)). He was again referred to our lung unit. Computed tomography of the chest showed apical infiltrates in both lungs (figure 2).
Antibiotic treatment was immediately withdrawn, and the patient quickly recovered. Corticosteroid treatment was continued until his asthma symptoms were controlled and his peripheral blood eosinophil count was acceptable (0.44 x 109/l (7%)). At follow up at six months his eosinophil count was 0.45 x 109/l, and a chest x ray picture showed no abnormalities.
Differential diagnoses include helmintic infestations, aspergillosis, tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, Hodgkin's disease, and other lymphoproliferative disturbances such as pulmonary eosinophilic granuloma, interstitial pneumonia, and vascular collagen disturbances.2 3 5 15 Appropriate laboratory tests include a blood cell count to determine the eosinophil count.16 Other important tests include plasma IgE, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, eosinophilia in sputum, faecal test for helminths, skin allergy tests, and plasma parasite evaluation.2 3 17 Radiographic characteristics of drug induced pulmonary infiltration with eosinophilia include focal alveolar opacity, diffuse alveolar opacity, diffuse interstitial opacity, and pulmonary nodules.5 Generally, lung function tests in the acute phase of pulmonary infiltration with eosinophilia show a restrictive ventilatory defect, which is accompanied by a reduction in carbon monoxide transfer factor. However, when asthma is present an obstructive ventilatory defect can appear during recovery, as in our patient.17 18
Often a diagnosis of drug induced pulmonary infiltration with eosinophilia is made on the basis of a temporal relation between drug treatment and the onset of symptoms.5 19 Rarely, when the clinical picture is not specific for the condition, diagnosis can be confirmed by a rechallenge test (which would be unethical) or a lymphocyte stimulation test with the suspected drug (which has low sensitivity).6 20
Contributors: Both authors were involved in the care of the patient and prepared the paper. CT will act as the guarantor.
Competing interests: None declared.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses