Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1066-1067 (17 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1066
James Read, final year medical student1, S J Winceslaus, consultant in genitourinary medicine2
1 Guy's, King's College, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London SE5 9RJ, 2 Preston Hall Hospital, Maidstone ME17 7NJ
Correspondence to: S J Winceslaus joseph.winceslaus{at}mtw-tr.nhs.uk
To cope with the anticipated increase in HIV testing without greatly increasing the clinic's workload, we changed the testing protocol. We replaced the detailed oral counselling before testing with a shorter, written explanation of the salient points. These points included a brief explanation of HIV and AIDS and of the "window period" (the first three months of infection, during which the test may not show a positive result); the advantages of the test; and the effect of positive (or negative) results on life insurance. Before testing, clients had to read and sign the information sheet, acknowledging their understanding of and consent to the test.
Using the clinic's quarterly KC60 returns (forms for recording the activity of genitourinary medicine clinics), we compared clinic attendance, number of HIV tests performed, and number of HIV positive diagnoses from 1 April 2001 (a month before the new protocol) to 31 December 2001 with the same data for the three years before 1 April 2001.
The average clinic attendance per quarter increased from 232 to 352 clients, and the average number of HIV tests performed per quarter also increasedfrom 33 to 130 (table). The proportion of clients who had an HIV test thus rose from 14% to 37%. Three cases of HIV infection were diagnosed from 1 April to 31 December 2001, compared with no cases diagnosed in the preceding three years (table).
|
The reasons that attendance increased in the quarter in which the protocol was changed are complex as similar changes were seen nationally. The changes are due partly to increased referrals to the genitourinary medicine services (after publication of the national strategy for sexual health and HIV3) and to the public's response to the reported national increase in sexually transmitted infections.
Many young people attending our clinic, however, do so after hearing about us from friends and peers. We therefore feel that such publicity about the "user friendly" local services that the new HIV testing policy had generated could also have contributed to attracting more clients.
Although our clinic has now achieved the Department of Health's 2004 target for HIV testingthat 40% of patients attending genitourinary medicine clinics should receive the testwe still need to identify the factors preventing some clients from taking up the test.3
The increase in attendance and testing also led to an increase in the number of HIV cases diagnosed. Two of the three cases were in women considered to be at low risk of infection; these women would not have been tested under the old system, thus delaying diagnosis.
Overall, we are satisfied with the outcome of our new policy for HIV testing and detection and recommend it to other clinics.
Contributors: JR was responsible for collecting, critically analysing, and interpreting all the data and for writing the report. SJW planned, designed, and implemented the new protocol, revised the paper, and approved the final version. SJW will act as guarantor.
Competing interests: None declared.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses