Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Kamran Abbasi Doctors smoking in the mess, patients puffing away
in corridors, cigarette stubs discarded in waiting rooms and
outpatients. Images that are immediately identified with hospital
culture in the United Kingdom. Daily experiences that health workers
rarely give a second thought to. But in an attempt to create a smoke free world we cannot bring you a smoke free journal.
What we should be campaigning for, at least, is smoke free hospitals,
as Martin McKee and colleagues explain (p 941). This is another area
where UK health care lags behind its equivalents in the United States,
where over 90% of hospitals were smoke free by the mid-1990s and over
40% had exceeded national recommendations. Meanwhile, a hospital
nearing completion this year in Northern Ireland is including seven
smoking rooms for patients and staff at a cost of half a million
pounds. There is growing evidence about the effectiveness of workplace
bans in reducing smoking, including a systematic review published in
the BMJ last year that found that the effect of a total
workplace ban would be equal to that achievable by almost doubling the
price of cigarettes. McKee and colleagues argue that money set aside
for hospital smoking rooms would be better spent implementing smoking
bans and expanding smoking cessation activities. But these themselves
can flounder, as researchers in the Australian Smoking Cessation
Consortium discovered (p 952). Funded by GlaxoSmithKline, makers of
smoking cessation treatment bupropion, this consortium recently lost
many of its researchers. They resigned in protest at the company's decision to take legal action to block new government controls on
bupropion, which is most effective if people complete the full course
of treatment and receive counselling and support. The problem is that
the prevalence of smoking in Australia has not changed since the
introduction of bupropion, despite 10% of smokers being prescribed the
drug. One study has shown that only 20% of people prescribed bupropion
complete the full course of treatment, and less than half receive counselling.
After prevention and cessation, this week's BMJ also
attempts to understand influences on smoking behaviour. Judith Bush and her team explore smoking culture in British Asian communities, where
smoking prevalence is high in Bangladeshi men but low in all Asian
women (p 962). There are some specific influences of sex and religion,
but the culture of smoking also bears strong similarities to that of
white smokers, particularly among younger adults. Bush's team
recommends culturally sensitive smoking cessation interventions for
Asian adults, a group ignored by current national guidelines.
And for those who enjoy recreational cannabis and may have convinced
themselves that cannabis is less harmful than tobacco, the current
evidence, although not as robust as that for tobacco smoke, is that
smoking cannabis is a comparable public health hazard (p 942).
Footnotes
To receive Editor's choice by email each week subscribe via our website: bmj.com/cgi/customalert
Read all Rapid Responses