Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR Firstly, the only probably treatable organism in the throat is
streptococcus, virtually all else is viral.
Secondly, during the second world war the US government decided that
the only sensible treatment was to give all troops complaining of a
sore throat an injection of penicillin. They were unlikely to complete
a 10 day course of antibiotics orally, and the risk of anaphylaxis was
less than the risk of a war injury.
Thirdly, multiple studies show that it is very difficult to get anyone
to complete a 10 day course of penicillin.
Fourthly, drug resistance is on the rise due to overuse of antibiotics.
Fifthly, rapid tests for streptococci have been available for over 10 years. They can give reliable results within minutes and have been
standard practice in the United States for ages but very unpopular with
UK authorities. Could it be because the penicillin is cheaper than
the test?
Sixthly, there is only weak evidence that treating strep throat with
antibiotics hastens resolution of symptoms, but we would like to
believe that it will reduce the presence of secondary complications
such as rheumatic fever and quinsy (but not glomerulonephritis).
If you are determined to reduce the overuse of antibiotics either do a
culture and wait 24-48 hours to treat positive results or do a rapid
strep test and treat patients whose results are positive. Either
strategy will prevent complications and would be equally efficacious in
relieving symptoms. In the developing world or inner cities, where only
relatively ill patients come to the doctor and compliance is difficult,
an injection of penicillin or short course of azithromycin is sensible.
Once the patients realise that the complaint of sore throat is greeted
with an injection they will be very judicious of their use of the
doctor's services.
With reference to the article by Kumar et al, I find it hard to
believe that the argument still goes on about the treatment of sore
throats.1 If I had the energy I would dig up the articles to support the following statements.
Warren Children's Centre, Lisburn, Northern Ireland BT28
1LQ martel{at}doctors.org.uk
Competing interests: None declared.
| 1. |
Kumar S, Little P, Britten N.
Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for sore throats? Grounded theory interview study.
BMJ
2003;
326:
138-141 |