BMJ 2003;326:713 ( 29 March )

Letters

Artificially giving nutrition and fluids is not one action

EDITOR---The and colleagues' description of decision making for patients with severe dementia who have difficulties in eating and drinking, raises several troubling issues.1

Firstly, they implicitly consider tube feeding to be life sustaining. In fact, no credible data show that tube feeding prolongs life in advanced dementia.2-5 An honest summary of the data is, "We have no good evidence that tube feeding will prolong life, and chances are good your loved one will die soon if we put in a tube." To offer, "We could put in a tube or you can let your loved one starve" is inaccurate and often hurtful.

Secondly, administering nutrition and fluids is treated as a single intervention, one all or nothing decision. Acute, self limited illnesses can stop fluid intake, causing death in days. Providing fluids can prolong life. Unlike dehydration, poor intake of nutrients rarely threatens life acutely, usually occurring in chronic illness. Furthermore, fluids may be replaced orally, subcutaneously, intravenously, or enterally, whereas long term parenteral and enteral nutrition may impose substantial burdens. Nutrition and hydration are very different decisions.

Finally, The et al refer twice to prolonging life "unnecessarily" and twice say that to prolong life would not be beneficial. If an incapacitated patient is allowed to die without life sustaining treatment, something serious and extremely complex has occurred. To say "unnecessary" or "not beneficial" conceals volumes. The true purport is to say the patient would be better off dead. Perhaps The et al used these terms as shorthand, or perhaps doctors and family members are the ones using this shorthand.

Patients nearing death or their carers must often choose between a future that offers longer survival with intensified suffering, or an alternative where comfort and dignity are emphasised instead. Tube feeding in advanced dementia is not such a decision; it neither prolongs survival nor enhances comfort and dignity.

Thomas Finucane, professor of medicine
tfinucan{at}jhmi.edu

Colleen Christmas, assistant professor of medicine
Johns Hopkins Geriatric Center, 5505 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA

Competing interests: None declared.



1. The AM, Pasman R, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Ribbe M, van der Wal G. Withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia: ethnographic study. BMJ 2002; 325: 1326-1330[Abstract/Free Full Text]. (7 December.)
2. Fisman DN, Levy AR, Gifford DR, Tamblyn R. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older residents of Quebec. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 349-353[ISI][Medline].
3. Meier DE, Ahronheim JC, Morris J, Baskin-Lyons S, Morrison RS. High short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with advanced dementia: lack of benefit of tube feeding. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 594-599[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Mitchell SL, Kiely DK, Lipsitz LA. Does artificial enteral nutrition prolong the survival of institutionalized elders with chewing and swallowing problems? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: M207-M213[Abstract].
5. Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D'Silva J, James G, Bolton RP, Bardhan KD. Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1472-1475[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].


© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia: ethnographic study
Anne-Mei The, Roeline Pasman, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Miel Ribbe, and Gerrit van der Wal
BMJ 2002 325: 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview