Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR Firstly, they implicitly consider tube feeding to be life sustaining.
In fact, no credible data show that tube feeding prolongs life in
advanced dementia.2-5 An honest summary of the data is, "We have no good evidence that tube feeding will prolong life, and
chances are good your loved one will die soon if we put in a tube."
To offer, "We could put in a tube or you can let your loved one
starve" is inaccurate and often hurtful.
Secondly, administering nutrition and fluids is treated as a single
intervention, one all or nothing decision. Acute, self limited
illnesses can stop fluid intake, causing death in days. Providing
fluids can prolong life. Unlike dehydration, poor intake of nutrients
rarely threatens life acutely, usually occurring in chronic illness.
Furthermore, fluids may be replaced orally, subcutaneously,
intravenously, or enterally, whereas long term parenteral and enteral
nutrition may impose substantial burdens. Nutrition and hydration are
very different decisions.
Finally, The et al refer twice to prolonging life "unnecessarily"
and twice say that to prolong life would not be beneficial. If an
incapacitated patient is allowed to die without life sustaining treatment, something serious and extremely complex has occurred. To say
"unnecessary" or "not beneficial" conceals volumes. The true
purport is to say the patient would be better off dead. Perhaps The et
al used these terms as shorthand, or perhaps doctors and family members
are the ones using this shorthand.
Patients nearing death or their carers must often choose between a
future that offers longer survival with intensified suffering, or an
alternative where comfort and dignity are emphasised instead. Tube
feeding in advanced dementia is not such a decision; it neither prolongs survival nor enhances comfort and dignity.
The and colleagues' description of decision making for patients
with severe dementia who have difficulties in eating and drinking,
raises several troubling issues.1
tfinucan{at}jhmi.edu
Colleen Christmas
Johns Hopkins Geriatric Center, 5505 Hopkins Bayview Circle,
Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
Competing interests: None declared.
| 1. |
The AM, Pasman R, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Ribbe M, van der Wal G.
Withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia: ethnographic study.
BMJ
2002;
325:
1326-1330 |
| 2. | Fisman DN, Levy AR, Gifford DR, Tamblyn R. Survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older residents of Quebec. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47: 349-353[ISI][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Meier DE, Ahronheim JC, Morris J, Baskin-Lyons S, Morrison RS.
High short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with advanced dementia: lack of benefit of tube feeding.
Arch Intern Med
2001;
161:
594-599 |
| 4. | Mitchell SL, Kiely DK, Lipsitz LA. Does artificial enteral nutrition prolong the survival of institutionalized elders with chewing and swallowing problems? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: M207-M213[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D'Silva J, James G, Bolton RP, Bardhan KD. Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1472-1475[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |