Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
H David McCarthy a Department of Health and Human Sciences, London
Metropolitan University, London N7 8DB, b Centre for Paediatric
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N
1EH Correspondence to: H D McCarthy d.mccarthy{at}londonmet.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To compare changes over time in waist
circumference (a measure of central fatness) and body mass index (a
measure of overall obesity) in British youth.
Design:
Representative cross sectional surveys in 1977, 1987, and 1997.
Setting:
Great Britain.
Participants:
Young people aged 11-16 years surveyed
in 1977 (boys) and 1987 (girls) for the British Standards Institute (n=3784) and in 1997 (both sexes) for the national diet and nutrition survey (n=776).
Main outcome measures:
Waist circumference, expressed
as a standard deviation score using the first survey as reference, and
body mass index (weight(kg)/height(m)2), expressed as a
standard deviation score against the British 1990 revised reference.
Overweight and obesity were defined as the measurement exceeding the
91st and 98th centile, respectively.
Results:
Waist circumference increased sharply over the period between surveys (mean increases for boys and girls, 6.9 and
6.2 cm, or 0.84 and 1.02 SD score units, P<0.0001). In centile terms,
waist circumference increased more in girls than in boys. Increases in
body mass index were smaller and similar by sex (means 1.5 and 1.6, or
0.47 and 0.53 SD score units, P<0.0001). Waist circumference in 1997 exceeded the 91st centile in 28% (n=110) of boys and 38% (n=147)
of girls (against 9% for both sexes in 1977-87, P<0.0001), whereas
14% (n=54) and 17% (n=68), respectively, exceeded the 98th
centile (3% in 1977-87, P<0.0001). The corresponding rates for body
mass index in 1997 were 21% (n=80) of boys and 17% (n=67) of
girls exceeding the 91st centile (8% and 6% in 1977-87) and 10%
(n=39) and 8% (n=32) exceeding the 98th centile (3% and 2% in
1977-87).
Conclusions:
Trends in waist circumference during the
past 10-20 years have greatly exceeded those in body mass index,
particularly in girls, showing that body mass index is a poor proxy for
central fatness. Body mass index has therefore systematically
underestimated the prevalence of obesity in young people.
|
What is already known on this topic
Body mass index gives no indication of body fat distribution Waist circumference is a marker for central body fat accumulation; a large waist circumference is linked to an increased risk of metabolic complications What this study adds
The accumulation of central body fat has risen more steeply than whole body fatness based on height and weight Current and future morbidity in British youth may be seriously affected due to accumulation of excess central fat |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies have shown an increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity in British children over the past 10-15 years. 1 2 These findings have been based on body mass index and recently standardised cut-off points. 3 4 But body mass index gives no indication of the distribution of body fat, and in children, as in adults, centralised or upper body fat carries an increased risk for metabolic complications. For example, visceral adipose tissue is significantly related to concentrations of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides in 11-15 year olds as well as to concentrations of basal insulin and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (inversely) in females aged 10-16 years. 5 6 Furthermore, abnormalities in lipid concentrations and insulin concentration correlate with waist circumference in young people. 7 8 Waist circumference is a highly sensitive and specific measure of upper body fat in young people and so should be valuable for identifying overweight and obese children at risk of developing metabolic complications. 9 10 To this end we have recently had published the first waist circumference centile curves for British children and adolescents.11
An examination of secular trends in waist circumference in British
children would add valuable comparative data to the evidence of trends
in body mass index. We compared data on waist circumference, together
with body mass index, in the same young people, collected in surveys
over the past 10-20 years in Great Britain.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Participants
We obtained data for height, weight, and waist circumference,
previously collected from British youth in two large cross sectional
surveys. The first was conducted for the British clothing industry by
the Human Measurements, Anthropometry, and Growth Research Group at
Loughborough University in several sweeps, in particular males aged
6-16 years (1977) and females aged 6-17 years (1987). The participants
represented socioeconomic, ethnic, and urban or rural groups as they
occurred in the British population.12 The second survey
was the national diet and nutrition survey of young people aged 4-18 years carried out in 1997, where waist circumference was measured in
young people aged 11 years and over.13 We selected for
analysis data on 4560 young people aged 11-16.99 years.
Anthropometric measurements
In both surveys height was measured without shoes. In the
British Standards Institute survey weight was measured with
participants wearing minimal clothing, whereas in the national diet and
nutrition survey heavy clothing, jewellery, and small change were
removed before weighing (weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg and
corrected for clothing effects). In both surveys, waist circumference
(cm) was measured midway between the 10th rib and the top of the iliac
crest.14 In the British Standards Institute survey
clothing did not significantly influence the measurement, whereas in
the national diet and nutrition survey the effect of clothing on waist
circumference was not reported. To verify the clothing effect, we
obtained data on 23 young people aged 11-16 years from a local
comprehensive school. We took duplicate measurements at the same site
over a school shirt, T shirt, or vest, and again over skin. The
correlation between pairs of measurements was 0.994. The regression
equation for predicting y (waist over skin) from x (waist over
clothing) was y=0.994x-0.42, equivalent to a mean difference of 0.4 cm. For convenience, we corrected for waist circumference in the
national diet and nutrition survey by subtracting 0.5 cm. Five
participants had data missing for either body mass index or waist circumference.
Statistical methods
We derived body mass index as weight(kg)/height(m)2
and converted it to a standard deviation score using the revised 1990 British reference.3 Waist circumference was expressed as a
standard deviation score using the recently published reference based
on the data from the British Standards Institute survey.11 For each survey we calculated means and standard deviations by sex, and
we compared means with Student's t test. The secular change
in waist circumference was adjusted for corresponding changes in body
mass index and height with multiple regression. We used cut-off points
corresponding to the 91st and 98th centiles (SD scores 1.33 and 2, respectively) to define overweight and obesity based on body mass index
and waist circumference separately. We compared observed and expected
numbers in each category using the
2 test and logistic
regression. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 10.0 and Data Desk (Data Description, Ithaca, NY) version 6.1.1.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mean waist circumference and body mass index for females and males by age were appreciably greater in the national diet and nutrition survey than in the British Standards Institute survey (P<0.001 for all groups except body mass index in males aged 13, P<0.05), the differences being similar at all ages (figs 1 and 2). The mean increase in body mass index was 1.5 (SE 0.16) for males and 1.6 (SE 0.16) for females. The mean increase in waist circumference was 6.9 (SE 0.46) cm for males and 6.2 (SE 0.34) cm for females (all P<0.0001). The standard deviations were also larger in the national diet and nutrition survey than in the British Standards Institute survey.
|
|
Standard deviation scores for waist circumference increased much more than for body mass index. The mean increase in waist circumference in males was 0.84 units versus 0.47 units for body mass index, whereas in females the contrast was even greater (1.02 units versus 0.53; table 1). Waist circumference increased by 0.18 (SE 0.08) units more in the females than in the males, and the variability in the females in 1997 was also significantly greater than that in the males. The changes in the females correspond to a shift from the 50th to the 85th centile for waist circumference and the 44th to the 70th centile for body mass index.
|
The standard deviation scores for waist circumference were strongly correlated with body mass index (r=0.82 in males, 0.79 in females) and less with height (r=0.48 and 0.30). Adjusting for body mass index and height changes between surveys reduced the increase in mean waist circumference from 0.84 to 0.45 (SE 0.029) units in males and from 1.02 to 0.57 (SE 0.033) units in females. So less than half the increase in waist circumference was explained by increases in body mass index or height.
Table 2 shows the prevalence by sex of overweight and obesity based on
body mass index and waist circumference in the two surveys. In all
cases the prevalence increased over time
for example, for overweight
from 6-9% in 1977 and 1987 to 17-38% in 1997 (P<0.0001). The
increases were appreciably larger for waist circumference (20-29%
overweight and 11-14% obese) than for body mass index (11-13%
overweight and 7% obese) (P<0.001). Based on waist circumference, more than one third of females in 1997 were overweight and over one
sixth were obese.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined two indices of fatness, body mass index and waist circumference, in British youth aged 11-16 years surveyed 10 years apart (1987 and 1997 for females) and 20 years apart (1977 and 1997 for males). We found large increases in both indices, substantially more for waist circumference than for body mass index, reflecting the widely documented trend to increased child obesity. This suggests a steeper rise in abdominal obesity than whole body obesity based on weight and height.
The definition of child overweight and obesity is arbitrary.4 The cut-off points used here, the 91st (overweight) and 98th (obese) centiles, were chosen because they are standard on the British charts; and because the 91st and 98th centiles for body mass index are similar to the recently described cut-off points for overweight and obesity determined by the International Obesity Task Force.4
The increased waist circumference is unlikely to be due to visceral adipose tissue alone; it probably reflects both visceral and subcutaneous fat and hence total fatness. In contrast the body mass index measures the sum of fat mass and fat free mass, and it is impossible to know the relative contributions of each.15 This suggests that body composition has changed over time, the increase in fat mass being obscured by a reduction in muscle mass. This has been shown by comparing contemporary children with Fomon's reference child.16 Monitoring trends in body mass index alone fails to identify this shift from muscle to fat.
In obese adolescents the accumulation of excess fat is known to occur predominantly in the upper body rather than in the peripheral region. 6 17 A similar trend to central fatness based on measurements of skinfold thickness has recently been observed in Spanish youth, showing that the phenomenon is not unique to Britain.18
Methodological differences may have accounted in part for these observations. However, in both surveys the site of the waist measurement was defined identically. Furthermore, with a low reported technical error of measurement,19 low intraobserver and interobserver error (unpublished data), and adjustment for clothing, it is likely that the increases in waist circumference are genuine.
It is not yet possible to guess the impact of these increases in waist circumference on current and future morbidity, but they should be a cause for concern. One US study found that young people above the 90th centile for waist circumference had higher concentrations of low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and insulin and lower concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol than young people below the 10th centile.8 This may well be mirrored in British youth. It is not known how early in life the increases in waist circumference over the reference values from 1977 and 1987 are detectable in a contemporary population, although we have observed similar increases in children as young as 3 years (unpublished observations).
Another concern is the difference between the sexes. Males were followed over 20 years compared with 10 years for females, so the males ought to have shown a larger secular trend. Yet the increase was appreciably larger in the females than in the males, for reasons that are unclear. Energy intake has decreased to a similar extent in the sexes.13 It may be that levels of physical activity have decreased faster in females than in males. If so then central fatness may be related more to physical activity than to energy intake.
In conclusion, we found that in British youth aged 11-16 years, waist
circumference, representing central fatness, has increased much faster
than body mass index over 10-20 years. Further work is necessary to
examine the link between waist circumference, body fatness, and
morbidity in young people. Waist circumference should be routinely
measured in schoolchildren. Urgent action is needed to reverse the
trends and reduce the likely medical and psychological costs of the
increase in obesity in young people.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the referee Peter Betts for his comments on the paper and the University of Loughborough and the Data Archive, University of Essex, for supplying the data.
Contributors: HDM had the original idea and obtained the data. HDM and TJC did the analyses. HDM, SME, and TJC wrote the paper. HDM will act as guarantor for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: HDM and SME were supported by the University of North London diversity and development fund. TJC was supported by Medical Research Council programme grant G9827821.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bundred P, Kitchener D, Buchan I.
Prevalence of overweight and obese children between 1989 and 1998: population based series of cross sectional studies.
BMJ
2001;
322:
326-328 |
| 2. |
Chinn S, Rona R.
Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity in three cross sectional studies of British children, 1974-94.
BMJ
2001;
322:
24-26 |
| 3. |
Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA.
Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990.
Arch Dis Child
1995;
73:
25-29 |
| 4. |
Cole TJ, Bellizzi C, Flegal KM, Dietz WH.
Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.
BMJ
2000;
320:
1240-1253 |
| 5. | Brambilla P, Manzoni P, Sironi S, Simone P, Del Maschio A, di Natale B, et al. Peripheral and abdominal adiposity in childhood obesity. Int J Obesity 1994; 18: 795-800[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Caprio S, Hyman LD, McCarthy S, Lange R, Bronson M, Tamborlane WV.
Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: importance of the intraabdominal fat depot.
Am J Clin Nutr
1996;
64:
12-17 |
| 7. | Flodmark CE, Sveger Y, Nilsson-Ehle P. Waist measurement correlates to a potentially atherogenic lipoprotein profile in obese 12-14 year old children. Acta Paediatr 1994; 83: 941-945[Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Freedman DS, Serdula MK, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS.
Relation of circumferences and skinfold thicknesses to lipid and insulin concentrations in children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study.
Am J Clin Nutr
1999;
69:
308-317 |
| 9. |
Daniels SR, Khourty PR, Morrison JA.
Utility of different measures of body fat distribution in children and adolescents.
Am J Epidemiol
2000;
152:
1179-1184 |
| 10. |
Taylor RW, Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A.
Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3-19 years.
Am J Clin Nutr
2000;
72:
490-495 |
| 11. | McCarthy HD, Jarrett KV, Crawley HF. Development of waist circumference percentiles in British children aged 5.0-16.9 y. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001; 55: 902-907[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 12. | British Standards Institute. Body measurements of boys and girls from birth up to 16.9 years, BS7321. London: BSI, 1990. |
| 13. | Gregory J, Lowe S. National diet and nutrition survey, young people aged 4 to 18 years. London: Stationery Office, 2000. |
| 14. | World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: a report of a WHO expert committee. Geneva: WHO, 1995. |
| 15. |
Maynard LM, Wisemandle W, Roche AF, Chumlea C, Guo SS, Siervogel RM.
Childhood body composition in relation to body mass index.
Paediatrics
2001;
107:
344-350 |
| 16. | Wells JCK, Coward WA, Cole TJ, Davies PSW. The contribution of fat and fat-free tissue to body mass index in contemporary children and the reference child. Int J Obes 2002; 26: 1323-1328[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 17. | Moreno LA, Fleta J, Mur L, Sarria A, Bueno M. Fat distribution in obese and non-obese children and adolescents. J Paedr Gastr Nutr 1998; 27: 176-180[CrossRef]. |
| 18. | Moreno LA, Fleta J, Sarria A, Rodriguez G, Gil C, Bueno M. Secular changes in body fat patterning in children and adolescents of Zaragoza (Spain), 1980-1995. Int J Obesity 2001; 25: 1656-1660[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]. |
| 19. | Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric error and the assessment of nutritional status. Brit J Nutr 1999; 82: 165-177[Web of Science][Medline]. |
(Accepted 22 January 2003)
Read all Rapid Responses